<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="656" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://conwayhallcollections.omeka.net/items/show/656?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-05-13T18:38:10-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="930">
      <src>https://d1y502jg6fpugt.cloudfront.net/25778/archive/files/4d8876b45cf6e6e49324c880c362ed84.pdf?Expires=1779321600&amp;Signature=ILGZEFEWfYswjhzYePBfz5Mamwz9k03Afgleqw5Ke%7EUS9BIypUi%7EdW4gayIMgzHwlzFzy6%7ECTp55gzQ63id-CwA3kBdkVQq3gSiRqzPYBUjij0mRLwNsy7QGE80KKsxsJcDY9XbmnzbrGg8YUK-n5dck4yYNCzVyx9GNasEj9V1ZHn%7EnhUWbqQ-IE0jNfpCyIasSp2inoHUg6eZYWYDVjXGx6bSsh8ldBEAs-JOKdMv7Ck0LYTmYlx-XXtlMZHO%7EQzOmRorTJOH6ZkpAZ-HXZAlBJYYt87Pms0-xHYoHLuA6Y12ysjiMfbUkz1mfjAjFCTqv5GTSx7NuYExDuJHBQg__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=K6UGZS9ZTDSZM</src>
      <authentication>c4f7f6120750014b8c1d4dcc2521660c</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="5">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="53">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="21279">
                  <text>NATIONAL SECULAR SOCIETY

“ TRUTH SEEKER” PAMPHLETS, No. 3.]

2nd EDITION.

SECULARISM,
BY

JOHN GRANGE,
(Editor of The Truth Seeker.}

PRICE ONE PENNY.

�S EC U L A RIS M.
I.
^^ECULARISM, as a distinct system of practical philosophy, is
still greatly misunderstood and misrepresented by many people
of fairly average intelligence.
It is a trite thing, prevalent
almost in every circle of life, to find orthodox theologians very loud and
flippant in their abuse of Secular thought without even possessing the
merest elementary knowledge of its import or signification.
Many
good and pious people, totally unfamiliar with the wide world of ideas,
express their abhorrence of it with fear and trembling, believing, in
their culpable ignorance, that Secularism is a sort of convenient cover
or apology for all the vile and vicious deeds of which mankind is
capable.
Other devout believers charitably aver that a vain desire for
notoriety prompts its advocacy.
Epigrammatic Christian phrases
frequently contain the declaration that Secularism is but an additional
synonym for the word sin.
Of course, the careful and patient student of science and
philosophy does not marvel much at the typical inanity and insanity of
these Christian ebullitions. His indignation is kept in check by his
knowledge of the spiteful attitude which Christian unreason has
invariably assumed, and still assumes, towards the expression of a new
thought. History forcibly teaches him the lesson that the real progress
of a new idea is lamentably slow. The human mind, emerging slowly
yet surely from the mire of superstitiousness, is too tenacious of ancient
follies and fictions.
The slightest mental change necessitates some
amount of moral courage, and this quality is doubtless a rarity in the
world, only to be found here and there among the more solid and
sterling characters. No mental effort is required to cherish the fables
and dreams of childhood ; to blindly obey the mystic influence of early
impressions ; to faithfully walk in the foot-prints of our superstitious
fore-fathers; or to follow silently the thought-fashion of the age. The
feeble mind of a child can easily follow these tendencies to perfection;
but the birth of saner, sounder, and healthier thought, which brings the
world sweetness and light, is solely dependent upon the vigorous
activity of a fearless, manly mind. Moreover, moral rectitude and
intellectual daring and robustness may be regarded as the surest and
safest tests of manhood.
But, alas 1 such noble traits of mind are not
too numerous in this modern age of cant, ft seems that the coward­
crop, like the fool-crop, is perennial. Theology sternly exacts fashion

�in thought, which, although involving the basest cowardice, is openly
regarded as a sublime virtue meriting eternal reward, while independence
of judgment is a crime of the blackest dye—deserving the Hames of
Hades.
Before the world can be reformed, all this powerfully
pernicious teaching must undergo thorough neutralisation or eradication.
That the bracing and elevating influence of the philosophy of Secularism
is capable of this, is my sincere and honest conviction.

II.

The meaning of Secularism.—Secularism has a most distinctive
signification, a oneness of meaning. It is a positive affirmation of the
supreme value and importance of this life.
It means that to make the
best possible use of the present existence is, not only to the unit, but to
society in general, all in all. The word Secularism is a term which
involves the decisive belief, utterly contrary to all theologies, that the
powers and capabilities of human nature are reasonably adequate to
meet the requirements of human life in all its multitudinous manifesta­
tions. This definition of necessity completely repudiates every vestige
of dependence on supernaturalism as a necessary factor in human
progress. Hence, to aim at the mastery and manipulation of natural
forces, with the special object of providing such material conditions as
shall lead to the promotion of human purity and happiness, constitutes
the very life-blood of Secular thought.
This humane and beneficent
desire, springing eternally from a consciousness of the efficacy of self­
help and self-reliance, is forced upon the intelligent freethinking mind
by the extension and systematisation of man’s knowledge of nature’s
intricate processes. Indeed all advancement is human, and not super­
human ; we know nothing of an intelligent progressive force outside
humanity. Each rung in the ladder of progress is made and climbed
by human skill and energy. Progress, like learning, has no royal road.
The eye of reason has discovered no special supernatural apparatus or
magical means whereby mankind can be materially elevated without
effort. Perpetual motion would be as easy of discovery.

III.
The basis of Secularism.—The basis of Secular philosophy is sound
and impregnable. The storms of controversy may rage as strongly and
fiercely as possible about the superstructure of this system of thought,
yet its foundation will remain unmoved and firm while human life
endures. It has no vague guess or baseless dream for its corner-stone,
but the solid and serious facts of conscious existence. If life has its
pains and pleasures, if life is real, then Secularism has a basis of
indisputable realism, because its teachings are formulated on the
assumption of the stern reality of mundane affairs.
Whatever
development the psychical nature of man, that prolific source of religious
consolation to traders in mysticism, may in future undergo, whatever
brilliant truth science may hereafter reveal, the successful invalidation of

�4

the basic principle of this philosophy is absolutely inconceivable. As
surely as the indestructibility of matter and the conservation of energy
have received scientific verification and sanction, so surely is Secularism
based upon the stubbornness of the facts of life.
Whether Secularism involves Atheism, has been a question of
much discussion.
Mr. Bradlaugh and Mr. J. M. Robertson have ably
expressed their judgment in the affirmative, while Mr. G. J. Holyoake,
Mr. Charles Watts, and Mr. G. W. Foote plausibly maintain that
Secularism is neither theistic nor Atheistic. With all due respect to
this brilliant trio of Freethought advocates, I must frankly avow my
warm appreciation and entire approval of the proposition, that
logical Secularism necessarily involves practical Atheism. Because if
Secularism has no God, then it is obviously godless, which simply means,
even etymologically, Atheism (Gr. a, without, theos, God). There only
seems to exist a verbal distinction between the two.
Philosophically considered, Secularism, while silently ignoring the
question of theism (according to its founder, Mr. Holyoake), commits a
practical repudiation of all forms of theistic thought by declaring itself
absolutely independent of such in working out the problems of life. It
does not, in any conceivable sense whatever, regard God as a necessary
power or existence, therefore he is most lightly treated as a superfluous
quantity, being altogether dispensable, so far as the teaching of
Secularism is concerned. This (confessedly) thoughtless relegation of
God to the region of unimportant trifles, as a subject, at any rate,
unworthy of immediate attention, savors keenly of a spirit of disrespect
and real blasphemy of which Atheism, even in its most positive stages,
is happily incapable.
Without Atheism, Secularism would certainly
appear to me a curiously lopsided philosophy.
If I may venture a metaphor, Secularism, in my humble opinion,
may be regarded as the visible part of the tree of Atheism. Its roots’,
and its conditions of growth, are truly godless. It grows healthier and
stronger in ratio to the extent that the poisonous weeds of theism
become eradicated from the garden of the human mind.

IV.

The teachings of Secularism.—The teachings of Secularism possess
a positively inspiring charm.
They aim to establish human welfare by
purely natural means and methods. They thoroughly distrust the God
or providence, of theology. The salvation of the human race must be
be means of human energy, human thought, and human work. Belief
in the mystic power of dead gods tends to vitiate true manhood, and to
weaken the spirit of self-help.
Basing its principles upon natural
grounds, Secularism teaches the cultivation and general development of
the physical, intellectual, and moral powers of man to the highest
degree attainable.
It, therefore, encourages discussion, welcomes a
fearless interchange of thought, and cherishes mental freedom.
It
desires, man to be truthful, just, sober, virtuous, industrious, and
self-i eliant, not for the sake of celestial gain, but because these qualities

�bring about in human society stability and happiness. There is no real
happiness without truth, without sobriety, without effort, without
freedom, without justice, without honor, without virtue, or without
love.
Human reason, illumined by experience, is our monitor and
director along the various paths of life.
We know no other guide so
reliable, so trustworthy, or so capable of wise discrimination and
direction.
Secularism therefore seeks to strengthen reason by
cultivating its faculties, and to vividly generalise experience by all the
means at command.
Secularism is pointedly severe in its moral doctrines. It does not
recognise the power of any god to undo an act or forgive a crime when
once perpetrated. It emphasises the fact that whenever a deed is once
committed, it must undoubtedly have its influence for good or for evil
in human society, and that a whole multitude of gods cannot destroy
or neutralise its effect. It has no specially-constructed loop-hole where­
by scoundrelism and infamy may easily escape their natural punishment
at the “ eleventh hour.”
This degrading arrangement, with all its
attendant evil influences, is the conspiciuous virtue of the Christian
scheme of salvation. From the same source we hear much about a wash
in the “blood of Jesus; ” but Secularism has a decided preference for
pure water and Pears’ soap.
Secularism declares that our actions in
every sphere of life concern our fellow-men. It finds, therefore, the
source of moral obligation in human nature. Human conduct is tested
by, and valued for, its power for good in this life. Moral culture and
mental discipline are thus recognised as necesssary to strengthen and
deepen human love and sympathy, and to purify and ennoble human
character.

V.
The destructive and constructive elements of Secularism.—If we
were to see a gardener diligently scattering his valuable flower-seed
broadcast on a piece of ground densely covered with weeds and
brushwood, what would be our first and last impression ? Should we
not have grave doubts as to his sanity ? We should wonder why he
had not, like a sensible cultivator, prepared the ground for that
purpose by clearing away all the useless and worthless growths. Just so;
and our surprise would be quite natural and reasonable in the
circumstances. Now the Secularist is the gardener of the human mind.
He starts about his work in a proper manner.
He seeks to destroy all
the useless and worthless beliefs which are only so many mental weeds
whose presence is harmful to the growth of better things.
From this
it will be seen that Secularism has certain necessary destructive
work to do.
Secularism, in its struggle for existence, aims, like every other system
of thought or theology, to completely destroy all those adverse elements
which militate against its success, and with which it finds itself in
ceaseless antagonism. I therefore maintain, that Christianity, in its
various forms and aspects cannot be logically or practically overlooked

�6
by Secularism.
Its hollow claims and pretensions must be openly
disputed and discredited before real Secular progress is possible. When
people have been born and trained amidst Christian influences, we have
to gradually convince them by a process of negative criticism that the
Christian doctrines are utterly unworthy of credence, and the Christian
God unworthy of worship, before they will abandon these teachings as
trivial and unimportant. The magic spell of the Christian superstition
must be broken, and its immoral allurements deprived of their
enchantment, ere the common multitude can find a sufficiency of
importance and interest in human affairs.
We must show that heaven
and hell are empty dreams, in order to profitably utilise that attention
which is at present absorbed in yearning for the former and dreading
the latter. All this means destructive work, but work which is highly
imperative if Secular ideals are to be endowed with life.
There is a parrot-cry among a certain section of Christian wailers
that Secularism is too destructive.
Possibly it is for their narrow and
puny creeds. It is unsparingly destructive of the foul and false, and of
all the priestly obstacles which impede the glorious onward march of
freedom, of knowledge, and of enlightenment. Theological religion may
be likened unto a huge tree whose fruit is deadly injurious to the
mental health and progress of our race, and it is the primary duty of
Secularism to raze it relentlessly to the ground.
Let us glance for a moment at the constructive side of Secular
philosophy. There is no system on earth more positive and constructive
than Secularism.
It has humanity for its material, the world for its
workshop, and all the sciences and arts for its levers and instruments.
It has human duties to perform, human life to make happy, human
rights to protect, human liberty to extend, and human knowledge to
increase. These objects are truly noble and inspiring; but they are
painfully difficult of accomplishment. The barbarous practice of cringing
on our knees in offering lazy prayers to God lends us no assistance.
Indeed, after many centuries of incessant Christian supplication, God is
still deaf and dumb. No audible word has yet escaped his lips, no
authentic answer has yet been recorded. Still the priests are busy,
still they pray—-because still the people pay them well for their trouble.
If the clergy sincerely believe in the efficacy of prayer, let them by all
means at once call the attention of the deity to the starving unemployed.
If he should answer by showering manna from heaven upon the place
beneath, then he would furnish us with a little evidence for the first
time that he is a being worthy of human gratitude.
But prayer, I fear, rather paralyses man’s spirit of self-help, and
powerfully retards his advancement. The problems of life are terribly
real and serious, and we must meet them with head erect and courageous
heart, like the brave soldier meets his foe.
Their solution is only
possible through the brain of man. No light from heaven is visible.
By studying the laws of life we steadily become better able to trace the
connection between cause and effect. That a knowledge of the laws of
health will guard us against disease, is a common fact. Thus Science is
proved to be our Savior.

�7
Secularism is positive to every true and useful tiling in life. While
it mercilessly sweeps away the dusty debris of ancient myths with the
broom of Science, it wisely utilises the cleared ground for the erection
of purer and saner fabrics that eloquently bespeak the progress and
culture of human thought. Being a philosophy based on the verities
of the pains and pleasures of this life, and on the improvability of life’s
conditions by purely human work, Secularism naturally confines itself,
in its diverse activities, to the domain of the known, of the verifiable.
Recognising the obvious barrenness of supernaturalism for good, it has
a reasonable belief in the potency and sufficiency of the powers of man.
It knows that the sacredness and sweetness of the domestic temple are
the rich products of human qualities, such as justice, equality, fidelity,
affection and love. It believes that the persistence of human thought,
sincerity, honesty, veracity, liberty, and integrity, endows a nation with
the grand and glorious element of lasting stability. It has hope and
trust in man. It has faith in his capabilities. It sees in him the
power that makes for light and for glory. It beholds in him not God,
but rather God’s maker and the world’s real redeemer.
Secularism is sanity of thought and sanity of action. Science and
Secularism have therefore mutual sympathies and reciprocal influences.
One materially fosters the development of the other.
They never fight
or struggle for supremacy. They are invariably hand in hand in firmest
friendship.
Secularism teaches us to live one life at a time, and live that well.
It professes no knowledge of any other.
It neither affirms, nor denies,
nor hopes for, immortal life. It regards the realities of this mundane
existence as sufficiently adequate to engage the attention and thought of
man. If we honestly do our best while living, we need have no fear of
the cold still silence of Death, around which theology’s base designs
have hung a myriad terrors. If there is a life beyond the tomb, true
and brave service here in humanity’s behalf should be the highest
possible qualification to merit and gain its choicest felicity. One thing,
above all others, is certain : we live on this earth; this life is
modifiable ; its sum of pain, or pleasure, may be increased or diminished
by the conduct of man; then let us like sane beings so shape our
conduct that the sunshine of true happiness may illumine every human
heart, and brighten every home. Let us teach our children the stern
yet true doctrine, that man must save himself ; that they must think
and work ; and that, however unpleasant it may be to the coward and
sluggard—Labor omnia vincit.
The Tmth Seeker Pamphlets may be

had prom

R. Forder, 28, Stonecutter Street, London, E.C.
A. &amp; H. Bradlaugh Bonner, 1 &amp; 2, Tooks Court, Cursitor Street, London, E.C.
“ Truth Seeker ” Company, 36, Villiers Street, Bradford.
Or of all Newsagents to Order.
Printed and published by the “ Truth Seeker” Company, Bradford.

�THE

Truth Seeker.
Edited by JOHN GRANGE.
A Monthly Journal devoted to Mental Freedom and Progress

SHOULD BE READ BY ALL FREETHINKERS.
PUBLISHED ON THE FIRST OF EACH MONTH.
LONDON:—R. FORDER, 28, Stonecutter Street, E.C.
BRADFORD :-J. W. GOTT, 36, Villiers Street.

“ TRUTH SEEKER ” PAMPHLETS.
--------s»
No. 1—Genesis and Science, by Stanley Jones
........................................0
No. 2—Christ and Ally Sloper, by Sam Standring........................................0
No. 3—Secularism, by John Grange.............................................................. 0
No. 5—The Decay of Belief, by G. Cohen
..
..
........................ 0 1
No. 5—His Satanic Majesty, by S. H. Alison................................................... 0
No. 6—Biography of A. B. Moss, by Wm. Heaford........................................ 0

d.
1
1
1

1
1

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="6">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2374">
                <text>Victorian Blogging</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16307">
                <text>A collection of digitised nineteenth-century pamphlets from Conway Hall Library &amp;amp; Archives. This includes the Conway Tracts, Moncure Conway's personal pamphlet library; the Morris Tracts, donated to the library by Miss Morris in 1904; the National Secular Society's pamphlet library and others. The Conway Tracts were bound with additional ephemera, such as lecture programmes and handwritten notes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please note that these digitised pamphlets have been edited to maximise the accuracy of the OCR, ensuring they are text searchable. If you would like to view un-edited, full-colour versions of any of our pamphlets, please email librarian@conwayhall.org.uk.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.heritagefund.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/attachments/TNLHLF_Colour_Logo_English_RGB_0_0.jpg" width="238" height="91" alt="TNLHLF_Colour_Logo_English_RGB_0_0.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16308">
                <text>Conway Hall Library &amp; Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16309">
                <text>2018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16310">
                <text>Conway Hall Ethical Society</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    <elementContainer>
      <element elementId="7">
        <name>Original Format</name>
        <description>The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data</description>
        <elementTextContainer>
          <elementText elementTextId="6503">
            <text>Pamphlet</text>
          </elementText>
        </elementTextContainer>
      </element>
    </elementContainer>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6500">
              <text>Secularism</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6501">
              <text>Edition: 2nd ed.&#13;
Place of publication: [London; Bradford]&#13;
Collation: 7 p. : ill. (port.) ; 21 cm.&#13;
Series title: Truth Seeker Pamphlets&#13;
Series number: No. 3&#13;
Notes: Publisher's advertisements, including the Truth Seeker, edited by John Grange, a monthly journal devoted to mental freedom and progress, on back cover. Portrait of the author on front cover. Part of the NSS pamphlet collection.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6502">
              <text>Grange, John</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6505">
              <text>[R. Forder; J.W. Gott]</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6506">
              <text>[n.d.]</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="6507">
              <text>N290</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="21280">
              <text>Secularism</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="21281">
              <text>&lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/"&gt;&lt;img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/p/mark/1.0/88x31.png" alt="Public Domain Mark" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;This work (Secularism), identified by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="https://conwayhallcollections.omeka.net/items/show/www.conwayhall.org.uk"&gt;&lt;span&gt;Humanist Library and Archives&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span&gt;, is free of known copyright restrictions.&lt;/span&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="21282">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="21283">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="21284">
              <text>English</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="1613">
      <name>NSS</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="151">
      <name>Secularism</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
