<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="377" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://conwayhallcollections.omeka.net/items/show/377?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-05-19T18:02:32-04:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="1670">
      <src>https://d1y502jg6fpugt.cloudfront.net/25778/archive/files/70cf2bac7fdd57726d77172875d774ce.pdf?Expires=1779926400&amp;Signature=h3hoebtoCk33nld1hem0za7KtX%7EKO8VbUYAIIL0Px51XDR-ypJBL1ePcXrg8gvGRL1N-7xNY338XNRWMGUhnAbrFxORqajOEhuMa0SsgKFPDWEedcbTVIup3TtX3JB7OjTU9L4xCtXaooJDCDVIKDsZldSRgfUBTrCAk0js4hBGl7xFQUmPrfBM%7EXRsWbxGxK2u3VpLAAMCnRSuAsfikXKHkz41eGA31FiG17qMp8pM2%7EeawuWlhuBY1K3iint%7Em-wt7Hc7qXJrYTG38EMJKa1sCFKvvo4GJXbQEJ0roD9aQl28Sz6UTUBb5hf1VLpZgAL1JNxRat1lHs14NHRuMBw__&amp;Key-Pair-Id=K6UGZS9ZTDSZM</src>
      <authentication>19b00fa9a7514ee527cfbe55c0d89161</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="5">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="53">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="26361">
                  <text>THE

GODS1

AN

ORATION

BY

COL. R. G. INGERSOLL.

Price Sixpence.

o'r;

LONDON:

rjq

$

R. FORDER, 28 STONECUTTER STREET, E.C.

$

��B7

NATIONAL secular SOCIETY

ORATION ON THE GODS

BY

COL. R. G. INGERSOLL.

^onbau:
R. FORDER, 28 STONECUTTER STREET, E.C.
1893.

�LONDON :
PRINTED BY G. W. FOOTE,
AT 14 CI.ERKENWELL GREEN, E.C

�Oration on the Gods.
“An Honest God is the Noblest Work of Man.’

Nearly every people have created a god, and the god
has always resembled his creators. He hated and loved
what they hated and loved, and he was invariably
found on the side of those in power. Each god was
intensely patriotic, and detested all nations but his
own. All these gods demanded praise, flattery, and
worship. Most of them were pleased with sacrifice,
and the smell of innocent blood has ever been con­
sidered a divine perfume. All these gods have insisted
upon having a vast number of priests, and the priests
have always insisted upon being supported by the
people, and the principal business of these priests has
been to boast about their god, and to insist that he
could easily vanquish all the other gods put together
These gods have been manufactured after number­
less models, and according to the most grotesque
fashions. Some have a thousand arms, some a hundred
heads, some are adorned with necklaces of living
snakes, some are armed with clubs, some with sword
and shield, some with bucklers, and some have wings
as a cherub ; some were invisible, some would show
themselves entire, and some would only show their
backs ; some were jealous, some were foolish ; some
turned themselves into men, some into swans, some
into bulls, some into doves and some into Holy Ghosts,
and made love to the beautiful daughters of men.
Some were married—all ought to have been—and some
were considered as old bachelors from all eternity.
Some had children, and the children were turned into
gods and worshipped as their fathers had been. Most
of these gods were revengeful, savage, lustful, and

�4

Oration on the Gods.

ignorant. As they generally depended upon their
priests for information, their ignorance can hardly
excite our astonishment.
These gods did not even know the shape of the
worlds they had created, but supposed them perfectly
fiat. Some thought the day could be lengthened by
stopping the sun, that the blowing of horns could
throw down the walls of a city, and all knew so little
of the real nature of the people they had created, that
they commanded the people to love them. Some were
so ignorant as to suppose that man could believe just
as he might desire, or as they might command, and
that to be governed by observation, reason and experi­
ence is a most foul and damning sin. None of these
gods could give a true account of the creation of this
little earth. All were wofully deficient in geology
and astronomy. As a rule they were most miserable
legislators, and as executives, they were far inferior
to the average of American presidents
These deities have demanded the most abject and
degrading obedience. In order to please them, man
must lay his very face in the dust. Of course, they
have always been partial to the people who created
them, and have generally shown their partiality by
assisting those people to rob and destroy others, and. to
ravish their wives and daughters.
Nothing is so pleasing to these gods as the butchery
of unbelievers. Nothing so enrages them, even now,
as to have someone deny their existence.
Few nations have been'so poor as to have but one
god. Gods were made so easy, and the raw material
cost so little, that generally the god-market was fairly
glutted, and heaven crammed with these phantoms.
These gods not only attended to the skies, but were
supposed to interfere in all the affairs of men. They
presided over everybody and everything. They
attended to every department. All was supposed to
be under their immediate control. Nothing was too
small—nothing too large : the falling of sparrows, the
flatulence of the people, and the motions of the planets
were alike attended to by these industrious and
observing deities. From their starry thrones they

�Oration on the Gods.

5

frequently came to the earth for the purpose of
imparting information to man. It is related of one,
that he came amid thund erings and lightnings, in
order to tell the people that they should not cook a
kid in its mother’s milk. Some left their shining
abodes to tell women that they should, or should not,
have children—to inform a priest how to cut and wear
his apron, and to give directions as to the proper
manner of cleaning the intestines of a bird.
When the people failed to worship one of these gods,
or failed to feed and clothe his priests (which was
much the same thing), he generally visited them with
pestilence and famine. Sometimes he allowed some
other nation to drag them into slavery—to sell their
wives and children ; but generally he glutted his
vengeance by murdering their firstborn. The priests
always did their whole duty, not only in predicting
these calamities, but in proving, when they did happen,
that they were brought upon the people because they
had not given quite enough to them.
These gods differed just as the nations differed : the
greatest and most powerful had the most powerful god,
while the weaker ones were obliged to content them­
selves with the very off-scourings of the heavens.
Each of these gods promised happiness here and here­
after to all his slaves, and threatened to eternally
punish all who either disbelieved in his existence, or
suspected that some other god might be his superior ;
but to deny the existence of all gods was, and is, the
crime of crimes. Redden your hands with human
blood ; blast by slander the fair fame of the innocent;
strangle the smiling child upon its mother’s knees;
deceive, ruin, and desert the beautiful girl who loves
and trusts you—and your case is not hopeless. For all
this, and for all these, you may be forgiven. For all
this, and for all these, that bankrupt court established
by the gospel will give you a discharge ; but deny the
existence of these divine ghosts, of these gods, and the
sweet and tearful face of Mercy becomes livid with
eternal hate. Heaven’s golden gates are shut, and you,
with an infinite curse ringing in your ears, with the
brand of infamy upon your brow, commence your

�6

Oration on the Gods.

endless wanderings in the lurid gloom of hell—an
immortal vagrant—an eternal outcast—a deathless
convict.
One of these gods, and one who demands our love,
our admiration, and our worship, and one who is
worshipped, if mere heartless ceremony is worship,
gave to his chosen people, for their guidance, the
following laws of war :
“ When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it,
then proclaim peace unto -it. And it shall be if it make thee
answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be that all
the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee,
and they shall serve thee. And if it will make no peace with
thee, but will make war against thee, then thou shalt besiege
it. And when the Lord thy God hath delivered it into thine
hands, thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of
the sword. But the women, and the little ones, and the cattle,
and all that is in the city, even all the spoil thereof shalt thou
take unto thyself, and thou shalt eat the spoil of thine enemies
which the Lord thy God hath given thee. Thus shalt thou do
unto all the cities which are very far off from thee, which are
not of the cities of these nations. But of the cities of these
people which the Lord thy God doth give thee for an inherit­
ance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breath eth.”
Is it possible for man to conceive of anything more
perfectly infamous ? Can you believe that such
directions were given by any being except an infinite
fiend ? Remember that the army receiving these
instructions was one of invasion. Peace was offered
upon condition that the people submitting should be
the slaves of the invader ; but if any should have the
courage to defend their homes, to fight for the love
of wife and child, then the sword was to spare none—

not even the prattling, dimpled babe.
And we are called upon to worship such a god ; to
get upon our knees and tell him that he is good, that
he is merciful, that he is just, that he is love. We are
asked to stifle every noble sentiment of the soul, and
to trample under foot all the sweet charities of the
heart. Because we refuse to stultify ourselves—refuse
to become liars—we are denounced, hated, traduced,
and ostracised here ; and this same God threatens to
torment us in eternal fire the moment death allows

�Oration on the Gods.

T

him to fiercely clutch our naked, helpless souls. Let
the people hate—let the god threaten; we will educate
them, and we will despise and defy him.
The book, called the Bible, is filled with passages
equally horrible, unjust, and atrocious This is the
book to be read in schools, in order to make our
children loving, kind and gentle! This is the book to
be recognised in our Constitution as the source of all
authority and justice.
Strange! that no one has ever been persecuted by
the church for believing God bad, while hundreds of
millions have been destroyed for thinking him good.
The orthodox church never will forgive the Universalists for saying, “ God is love.” It has always
been considered as one of the very highest evidences
of true and undefiled religion to insist that all men,
women and children deserve eternal damnation. It
has always been heresy to say “ God will at last save
all.”
We are asked to justify these frightful passages—•
these infamous laws of war, because the Bible is the word
of God. As a matter of fact, there never was, and there
never can be, an argument, even tending to prove the
inspiration of any book whatever. In the absence of
positive evidence, analogy, and experience, argument is
simply impossible, and at the very best can amount
only to a useless agitation of the air. The instant we
admit that a book is too sacred to be doubted, or even
reasoned about, we are mental serfs. It is infinitely
absurd to suppose that a god would address a commu,
nication to intelligent beings, and yet make it a crime,
to be punished in eternal flames, for them to use their
intelligence for the purpose of understanding his com­
munication. If we have the right to use our reason,
we certainly have the right to act in accordance with
it, and no god can have the right to punish us for such
action.
The doctrine that future happiness depends on belief
is monstrous. It is the infamy of infamies. The idea
that faith in Christ is to be rewarded by an eternity of
bliss, while a dependence upon reason, observation,
and experience merits everlasting pain, is too absurd

�Oration on the Gods.

for refutation, and can be believed only by that un­
happy mixture of insanity and ignorance, called
“ faith.” What man, who ever thinks, can believe that
blood can appease God ? And yet, our entire system of
religion is based upon that belief. The Jews pacified
Jehovah with the blood of animals, and, according to
the Christian system, the blood of Jesus softened the
heart of God a little, and rendered possible the salva­
tion of a fortunate few. It is hard to conceive how
the human mind can give its assent to such terrible
ideas, or how any sane man can read the Bible, and
still believe in the doctrine of inspiration.
Whether the Bible is true or false is of no conse­
quence in comparison with the mental freedom of the
race.
Salvation through slavery is worthless. Salvation
from slavery is inestimable,
As long as man believes the Bible to be infallible,
that book is his master. The civilisation of this century
is not the child of faith, but of unbelief—the result of
free thought.
All that is necessary, as it seems to me, to convince
any reasonable person that the Bible is simply and
purely of human invention—of barbarian invention—
is to read it. Read it as you would any other book ;
think of it as you would of any other ; get the bandage
of reverence from your eyes ; drive from your heart
the phantom of fear; push from the throne of your
brain the cowled form of superstition—then read the
holy Bible, and you will be amazed that you ever, for
one moment, supposed a being of infinite wisdom,
goodness and purity, to be the author of such ignorance
and of such atrocity.
Our ancestors not only had their god-factories, but
they made devils as well. These devils were generally
disgraced and fallen gods. Some had headed unsuc­
cessful revolts ; some had been caught sweetly reclining
in the shadowy folds of some fleecy clouds, kissing the
wife of the god of gods. These devils generally sym­
pathised with man. There is in regard to them a most
wonderful fact : in nearly all the theologies, mytho­
logies, and religions, the devils have been much more

�yy',r"r

Oration on the Gods.

* h,-

9

humane and merciful than the gods. No devil ever
gave one of his generals an order to kill children and
to rip open the bodies of pregnant women. Such bar­
barities were always ordered by the good gods. The
pestilences were sent by the most merciful gods. The
frightful famine, during which the dying child with
pallid lips sucked the withered bosom of a dead mother,
was sent by the loving gods. No devil was ever charged
with such fiendish brutality.
One of these gods, according to the account, drowned
an entire world, with the exception of eight persons.
The old, the young, the beautiful, and the helpless were
remorselessly devoured by the shoreless sea. This, the
most fearful tragedy that the imagination of ignorant
priests ever conceived, was the act, not of a devil, but
of a god, so-called, whom men ignorantly worship unto
this day. What a stain such an act would leave upon
the character of a devil 1 One of the prophets of one
of these gods, having in his power a captured king,
hewed him in pieces in the sight of all the people!
Was ever any imp of any devil guilty of such savagery ?
One of these gods is reported to have given the fol­
lowing directions concerning human slavery :
“ If thou buy a Hebrew servant, six years shall he serve,
and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing. If he
came in by himself, he shall go out by himself. If he were
married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master
have given him a wife, and she have borne him sons or
daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master’s, and
he shall go out by himself. And if the servant shall plainly
say, I love my master, my wife, and my children, I will not go
out free. Then his master shall bring him unto the judges;
he shall also bring him unto the door, or unto the door-post;
and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he
shall serve him for ever.”

According to this, a man was given liberty upon
condition that he would desert for ever his wife and
children. Did any devil ever force upon a husband,
upon a father, so cruel and so heartless an alternative ?
Who can worship such a God ? Who can bend the
knee to such a monster? Who can pray to such a
fiend ?

&lt; 7'S

�10

Oration on the Gods.

All these gods threatened to torment for ever the
souls of their enemies. Did any devil ever make so
infamous a threat ? The basest thing recorded of the
Devil is what he did concerning Job and his family,
and that was done by the express permission of one of
these gods, and to decide a little difference of opinion
between their “ serene highnesses ” as to the character
of “ my servant Job.”
The first account we have of the Devil is found in
that purely scientific book called Genesis, and is as
follows :
“Now. the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the
field which the Lord God had made, and he said unto the
woman, Yea, hath God said, ‘ Ye shall not eat of the fruit of
the trees of the garden ?’ And the woman said unto the
serpent, ‘We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden;
but of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden
God hath said, “ Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch
it, lest ye die.” ’ And the serpent said unto the woman, ‘ Ye
shall not surely die. For God doth know that in the day ye
eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened and ye shall be as
gods, knowing good and evil.’ And when the woman saw
that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the
eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the
fruit thereof and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with
her, and he did eat. . . . And the Lord God said, Behold, the
man is become as one of us, to know good and evil; and now,
lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life and
eat, and live for ever. Therefore the Lord God sent him forth
from the Garden of Eden to till the ground from whence he
was taken. So he drove out the man, and he placed at the
east of the Garden of Eden cherubims and a flaming sword,
which turned every way to keep the way of the tree of life.”

According to this account, the promise of the Devil
was fulfilled to the very letter. Adam and Eve did
not die, and they did become as gods, knowing good
and evil.
The account shows, however, that the gods dreaded
education and knowledge then just as they do now.
The Church still faithfully guards the dangerous tree
of knowledge, and has exerted in all ages her utmost
power to keep mankind from eating the fruit thereof.
The priests have never ceased repeating the old false­
hood and the old threat: “Ye shall not eat of it,

�Oration on the Gods.

11

neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.” From every
pulpit comes the same cry, born of the same fear,
“ Lest they eat and become as gods, knowing good and
evil ” For this reason, religion hates science, faith
detests reason, theology is the sworn enemy of philo­
sophy, and the Church with its flaming sword still
guards the hated tree, and, like its supposed founder,
curses to the lowest depths the brave thinkers who eat
and become as gods.
If the account given in Genesis is really true, ought
we not, after all, to thank this serpent ? He was the
first schoolmaster, the first advocate of learning, the
first enemy of ignorance, the first to whisper in human
ears the sacred word “ liberty,” the creator of ambition,
the author of modesty, of inquiry, of doubt, of investi­
gation, of progress, and of civilisation.
Give me the storm and tempest of thought and
action, rather than the dead calm of ignorance and
faith! Banish me from Eden when you will, but first
let me eat of the fruit of the tree of knowledge !
Some nations have borrowed their gods ; of this
number, we are compelled to say, is our own. The
Jews having ceased to exist as a nation, and having no
further use for a god, our ancestors appropriated him,
and adopted their devil at the same time. This
borrowed god is still an object of some adoration, and
this adopted devil still excites the apprehensions of
our people. He is still supposed to be setting his traps
and snares for the purpose of catching our unwary
souls, and is still, wfith reasonable success, waging the
old war against our God.
To me it seems easy to account for these ideas con­
cerning gods and devils. They are a perfectly natural
production. Man has created them all, and under the
same circumstances would create them again. Man
has not only created all these gods, but he has created
them out of the materials by which he has been
surrounded. Generally he has modelled them after
himself, and has given them hands, feet, eyes, ears, and
organs of speech. Each nation made its gods and
devils speak its language not only, but put in their

�12

Oration on the Gods.

mouths the same mistakes in history, geography,
astronomy, and in all matters of fact, generally made
by the people. No god was ever in advance of the
nation that created him. The negroes represented
their deities with black skins and curly hair. The
Mongolian gave to his a yellow complexion and dark
almond-shaped eyes. The Jews were not allowed to
paint theirs, or we should have seen Jehovah with a
full beard, and oval face, and an aquiline nose. Jove
was a perfect Greek, and Jupiter looked as though a
a member of the Roman Senate. The gods of Egypt
had the patient face and placid look of the loving
people who made them. The gods of northern countries
were represented warmly clad in robes of fur ; those
of the tropics were naked. The gods of India were
often mounted upon elephants ; those of the islanders
were great swimmers, and the deities of the Arctic
zone were passionately fond of whale’s blubber.
Nearly all people have carved or painted representa­
tions of their gods, and these representations were, by
the lower classes, generally treated a,s the real gods,
and to these images and idols they addressed prayers
and offered sacrifice.
In some countries, even at this day, if the people
after long praying do not obtain their desires, they
turn their images off as impotent gods, or upbraid
them in a most reproachful manner, loading them with
blows and curses. “ How now, dog of a spirit,” they
say ; “ we give you lodging in a magnificent temple,
we gild you with gold, feed you with the choicest food,
and offer incense to you, yet after all this care you are
so ungrateful as to refuse us what we ask.” Hereupon
they will pull the god down and drag him through the
filth of the street. If in the meantime it happens that
they obtain their request, then, with a great deal of
ceremony, they wash him clean, and carry him back
and place him in his temple again, where they fall
down and make excuses for what they have done. “ Of
a truth,” say they, “ we were a little too hasty, and you
were a little too long in your grant. Why should you
bring this beating on yourself ? But what is done
uannot be undone. Let us not think of it any more.

�Oration on the Gods

13

If you will forget what is past, we will gild you over
again brighter than before.”
Man has never been at a loss for gods. He has wor­
shipped almost everything, including the vilest and
most disgusting beasts. He has worshipped fire, earth,
air, water, light, stars, and for hundreds of ages pros­
trated himself before enormous snakes. Savage tribes
often make gods of articles they get from civilised
people. The Todas worship a cow-bell. The Kotas
worship two silver plates, which they regard as husband
and wife, and another tribe manufactured a god out of
a king of hearts.
Man having always been the physical superior of
woman, accounts for the fact that most of the high
gods have been males. Had WQman been the physical
superior, the powers supposed to be the rulers of Nature
would have been women, and instead of being repre­
sented in the apparel of man, they would have luxuriated
in trains, low-necked dresses, laces, and back-hair.
Nothing can be plainer than that each nation gives
to its god its peculiar characteristics, and that every
individual gives to his god his personal peculiarities.
Man has no ideas, and can have none, except those
suggested by his surroundings. He cannot conceive of
anything utterly unlike what he has seen or felt. He
can exaggerate, diminish, combine, separate, deform,
beautify, improve, multiply, and compare what he sees,
what he feels, what he hears, and all of which he takes
cognizance through the medium of the senses ; but he
cannot create. Having seen exhibitions of power, he
can say, omnipotent. Having lived, he can say immor­
tality. Knowing something of time, he can say eternity.
Conceiving something of intelligence, he can say God.
Having seen exhibitions of malice, he can say Devil.
A few gleams of happiness having fallen athwart the
gloom of his life, he can say, heaven. Pain, in its
numberless forms, having been experienced, he can
say hell. Yet all these ideas have a foundation in
fact, and only a foundation. The superstructu re has
been reared by exaggerating, diminishing, combining,
separating, deforming, beautifying, improving, or mul­
tiplying realities, so that the edifice, or fabric, is but

�14

Oration on the Gods.

the incongruous grouping of what man has perceived
through the medium of the senses. It is as though we
should give to a lion the wings of an eagle, the hoofs
of a bison, the tail of a horse, the pouch of a kangaroo,
and the trunk of an elephant. We have, in imagina­
tion, created an impossible monster. And yet the
various parts of this monster really exist. So it is with
all the gods that man has made.
Beyond nature man cannot go, even in thought;
above nature he cannot rise, below nature he cannot
fall.
Man, in his ignorance, supposed that all phenomena
were produced by some intelligent powers, and with
direct reference to him. To preserve friendly relations
with these powers was, and still is, the object of all
religions. Man knelt through fear and to implore
assistance, or through gratitude for some favor which
he supposed had been rendered. He endeavored by
supplication to appease some being who, for some
reason, had, as he believed, become enraged. The
lightning and thunder terrified him. In the presence
of the volcano he sank upon his knees. The great
forests filled with wild and ferocious beasts, the mon­
strous serpent crawling in mysterious depths, the
boundless sea, the flaming cQmets, the sinister eclipses,
the awful calmness of the stars, and, more than all, the
perpetual presence of death, convinced him that he
was the sport and prey of unseen and malignant
powers. The strange and frightful diseases to which
he was subject, the freezings and burnings of fever,
the contortions of epilepsy, the sudden palsies, the
darkness of night, and the wild, terrible, and fantastic
dreams that filled his brain, satisfied him that he was
haunted and pursued by countless spirits of evil. For
some reason he supposed that these spirits differed in
power—that they were not all alike malevolent—that
the higher controlled the lower, and that his very
existence depended upon gaining the assistance of the
more powerful. For this purpose he resorted to prayer,
to flattery, to worship, and to sacrifice. These ideas
appear to have been almost universal in savage'
man.

�Oration on the Gods.

15

For ages all nations supposed that the sick and insane
were possessed by evil spirits. For thousands of years
the practice of medicine consisted in frightening these
spirits away. Usually the priests would make the
loudest and most discordant noises possible. They
would blow horns, beat upon rude drums, clash cymbals,
and in the meantime utter the most unearthly yells.
If the noise-remedy failed, they would implore the aid
of some more powerful spirit.
To pacify these spirits was considered of infinite
importance. The poor barbarian, knowing that men
could be softened by gifts, gave to these spirits that
which to him seemed of the most value. With bursting
heart he would offer the blood of his dearest child. It
was impossible for him to conceive of a god utterly
unlike himself, and he naturally supposed that these
powers of the air would be affected a little at the sight
of so great and so deep a sorrow. It was with the
barbarians then as with the civilised now ; one class
lived upon and made merchandise of the fears of
another. Certain persons took it upon themselves
to appease the gods and to instruct the people in their
duties to these unseen powers. This was the origin of
the priesthood. The priest pretended to stand between
the wrath of the gods and the helplessness of man.
He was man’s attorney at the court of heaven. He
carried to the invisible world a flag of truce, a protest,
and a request. He came back with a command, with
authority, and with power. Man fell upon his knees
before his own servant, and the priest, taking advan­
tage of the awe inspired by his supposed influence
with the gods, made of his fellow-man a cringing
hypocrite and slave. Even Christ, the supposed son of
God, taught that persons were possessed of evil spirits,
and frequently, according to the account, gave proof of
his divine origin and mission by frightening droves of
devils out of his unfortunate country-men. Casting
out devils was his principal employment, and the
devils thus damaged generally took occasion to
acknowledge him as the true Messiah, which was not
only very kind of them, but quite fortunate for him.
The religious people have always regarded the

�1G

Oration on Ilio Gods.

testimony of these devils as perfectly conclusive, and
the writers of the New Testament quote the words of
these imps of darkness with great satisfaction.
The fact that Christ could withstand the temptations
of the Devil was considered as conclusive evidence
that he was assisted by some god, or at least by some
being superior to man. St. Matthew gives an account
of an attempt made by the Devil to tempt the supposed
son of God ; and it has always excited the wonder of
Christians that the temptation was so nobly and
heroically withstood. The account to which I refer is
as follows:
“ Then was Jesus led up of the spirit into the wilderness to
be tempted of the devil. And when the tempter came to him,
he said, ‘ If thou be the son of God command that these stones
be made bread.’ But he answered and said, ‘ It is written :
man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that
proceedeth out of the mouth of God.’ Then the devil taketh
him up into the holy city and setteth him upon a pinnacle of
the temple and saith unto him, ‘ If thou be the son of God,
cast thyself down ; for it is written, He shall give his angels
charge concerning thee, lest at any time thou shalt dash thy
foot against a stone.’ Jesus said unto him, ‘ It is written,
again, thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.’ Again the
devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain and
sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of
them, and saith unto him, ‘ All these will I give thee if thou
wilt fall down and worship me.’ ”
The Christians now claim that Jesus was God: If
he was God, of course the Devil knew that fact, and
yet, according to this account the Devil took the omni­
potent God and placed him upon a pinnacle of the
temple, and endeavored to induce him to dash himself
against the earth. Failing in that, he took the creator,
and owner, and governor of the universe up into an
exceeding high mountain, and offered him this world
—this grain of sand, if he, the God of all the worlds,
would fall down and worship him, a poor devil, with­
out even a tax title to one foot of dirt! Is it possible
the Devil was such an idiot? Should any great credit
be, given to this Deity for not being caught with such
chaff ? Think of it! The Devil—the prince of sharpers
—the king of cunning—the master of finesse, trying

�Oration on the Gods.

17

to bribe God with a grain of sand that belonged
to God!
Is there, in all the religious literature of the world,
anything more grossly absurd than this ?
These devils, according to the Bible, were of various
kinds—some could speak and hear, others were deaf
and dumb. All could not be cast out in the same way.
The deaf and dumb spirits were quite difficult to deal
with. St. Mark tells of a gentleman who brought his
son to Christ. The boy, it seems, was possessed of a
dumb spirit, over which the disciples had no control.
“ Jesus said unto the spirit, ‘ Thou dumb and deaf
spirit, I charge thee come out of him, and enter no
more into him.’ ” Whereupon, the deaf spirit (having
heard what was said) cried out (being dumb) and
immediately vacated the premises. The ease with
which Christ controlled this deaf and dumb spirit
excited the wonder of his disciples, and they asked him
privately why they could not cast that spirit out. To
whom he replied : “ This kind can come forth by
nothing but prayer and fasting.” Is there a Christian
in the whole world who would believe such a story, if
found in any other book ? The trouble is, these pious
people shut up their reason, and then open their Bibles.
In the olden times, the existence of devils was uni­
versally admitted. The people had no doubt upon that
subject, and from such belief it followed as a matter
of course, that a person, in order to vanquish these
devils, had either to be a god, or assisted by one. All
founders of religions have established their claims to
divine origin by controlling evil spirits and suspending
the laws of nature. Casting out devils was a certificate
of divinity. A prophet, unable to cope with the
powers of darkness, was regarded with contempt. The
utterance of the highest and noblest sentiments, the
most blameless and holy life, commanded but little
respect, unless accompanied by power to work miracles
and command spirits.
This belief in good and evil powers had its origin in
the fact that man was surrounded by what he was
pleased to call good and evil phenomena. Phenomena
affecting man pleasantly were ascribed to good spirits,
B

�18

Oration on the Gods.

while those affecting him unpleasantly or injuriously
were ascribed to evil spirits. It being admitted
that all phenomena were produced by spirits, the
spirits were divided according to the phenomena, and
the phenomena were good or bad as they affected man.
Good spirits were supposed to be the authors of good
phenomena, and evil spirits of the evil: so that the
idea of a devil has been as universal as the idea of
a god.
Many writers maintain that an idea to become
universal must be true ; that all universal ideas are
innate ; and that innate ideas cannot be false. If the
fact, that an idea has been universal, proves that it is
innate, and if the fact that an idea is innate proves
that it is correct, then the believers in innate ideas
must admit that the evidence of a god superior to
nature, and of a devil superior to nature, is exactly the
same, and that the existence of such a devil must be
as self-evident as the existence of such a god. The
truth is, a god was inferred from good, and a devil
from bad phenomena. And it is just as natural and
logical to suppose that a devil would cause happiness,
as to suppose that a god would produce misery. Conse­
quently, if an intelligence, infinite and supreme, is
the immediate author of all phenomena, it is difficult
to determine whether such intelligence is the friend
or enemy of man. If phenomena were all good, we
might say they were all produced by a perfectly
beneficent being. If they were all bad. we might say
they were produced by a perfectly malevolent power.
But as phenomena are, as they affect man, both good
and bad, they must be produced by different and
antagonistic spirits ; by one who is sometimes actuated
by kindness, and sometimes by malice ; or all must be
produced of necessity, and without reference to their
consequences upon man.
The foolish doctrine, that all phenomena can be
traced to the interference of good and evil spirits, has
been, and still is, almost universal. That most people
still believe in some spirit that can change the natural
order of events, is proven by the fact that nearly all
resort to prayer. Thousands, at this very moment are

�Oration on the Gods.

19

probably imploring some supposed power to interfere
in their behalf. Some want health restored ; some
ask that the loved and absent be watched over and
protected ; some pray for riches ; some for rain ; some
want diseases stayed; some vainly ask for food ; some
ask for revivals ; a few ask for more wisdom, and now
and then one tells the Lord to do as he may think best.
Thousands ask to be protected from the devil ; some,
like David, pray for revenge, and some implore, even
God, not to lead them into temptation. All these
prayers rest upon, and are produced by the idea that;
some power not only can, but probably will, change
the order of the universe. This belief has been among
the great majority of tribes and nations. All sacred,
books are filled with the accounts of such interferences.,
and our own Bible is no exception to this rule.
If we believe in a power superior to nature, it i»
perfectly natural to suppose that such power can and
will interfere in the affairs of this world. If there is
no interference, of what practical use can such power
be ? The scriptures give us the most wonderful
accounts of divine interference : Animals talk like
men ; springs gurgle from dry bones ; the sun and
moon stop in the heavens in order that General
Joshua may have more time to murder ; the shadow
on a dial goes back ten degrees to convince a petty
king of a barbarous people that he is not going to die
of a boil; fire refuses to burn; water positively
declines to seek its level, but stands up like a wall ;
grains of sand become lice ; common walking-sticks,
to gratify a mere freak, twist themselves into serpents,
and then swallow each other by way of exercise ;
murmuring streams, laughing at the attraction of
gravitation, run up hill for years, following wandering
tribes from a pure love of frolic : prophecy becomes
altogether easier than history ; the sons of God become
enamoured of the world’s girls; women are changed’
into salt for the purpose of keeping a great event fresh:
in the minds of men ; an excellent article of brimstone
is imported from heaven free of duty ; clothes refuse
to wear out for forty years ; birds keep restaurants and
feed wandering prophets free of expense ; bears tear

�20

Oration on the Gods.

children in pieces for laughing at old men without
wigs ; muscular development depends upon the length
of one’s hair; dead people come to life, simply to get a
joke on their enemies and heirs ; witches and wizards
converse freely with the souls of the departed, and
God himself becomes a stonecutter and engraver, after
having been a tailor and dressmaker
The veil between heaven and earth was always rent
or lifted. The shadows of this world, the radiance of
heaven, and the glare of hell, mixed and mingled until
man became uncertain as to which country he really
inhabited. Man dwelt in an unreal world. He mis­
took his ideas, his dreams, for real things. His fears
became terrible and malicious monsters. He lived in
the midst of furies and fairies, nymphs and naiads,
goblins and ghosts, witches and wizards, sprites and
spooks, deities and devils. The obscure and gloomy
depths were filled with claw and wing—with beak and
hoof—with leering look and sneering mouths—with
the malice of deformity—with the cunning of hatred,
and with all the slimy forms that fear can draw and
paint upon the shadowy canvas of the dark.
It is enough to make one almost insane with pity to
think what man in the long night has suffered ; of the
tortures he has endured, surrounded, as he supposed,
by malignant powers and clutched by the fierce
phantoms of the air. No wonder that he fell upon his
trembling knees—that he built altars and reddened
them even with his own blood. No wonder that
he implored ignorant priests and impudent magicians
for aid. No wonder that he crawled grovelling in the
dust to the temple’s door, and there, in the insanity of
despair, besought the deaf gods to hear his bitter cry of
agony and fear.
The savage, as he emerges from a state of barbarism,
gradually loses faith in his idols of wood and stone,
and in their place puts a multitude of spirits. As he
advances in knowledge, he generally discards the petty
spirits, and in their stead believes in one, whom
he supposes to be infinite and supreme. Supposing
this great spirit to be superior to nature, he offers
worship or flattery in exchange for assistance. At

�Oration on the Gods.

21

last, finding that he obtains no aid from this supposed
deity—finding that every search after the absolute
must of necessity end in failure—finding that man
cannot by any possibility conceive of the conditionless—
he begins to investigate the facts by which he is
surrounded, and to depend upon himself.
The people are beginning to think, to reason, and to
investigate. Slowly, painfully, but surely, the gods
are being driven from the earth. Only upon rare
occasions are they, even by the most religious, supposed
to interfere with the affairs of men. In most matters
we are at last supposed to be free. Since the invention
of steamships and railways, so that the products of all
countries can be easily interchanged, the gods have
quit the business of producing famine. Now and then
they kill a child because it is idolised by its parents.
As a rule they have given up causing accidents on
railroads, exploding boilers, and bursting kerosene
lamps. Cholera, yellow fever, and small-pox are still
considered heavenly weapons; but measles, itch, and
ague are now attributed to natural causes. As a general
thing, the gods have stopped drowning children,
except as a punishment for violating the Sabbath.
They still pay some attention to the affairs of kings,
men of genius, and persons of great wealth ; but
ordinary people are left to shirk for themselves as best
they may. In wars between great nations, the gods
still interfere ; but in prize fights, the best man, with
an honest referee, is almost sure to win.
The Church cannot abandon the idea of special
providence. To give up that doctrine, is to give up
all. The Church must insist that prayer is answered
—that some power superior to nature hears the grants
and requests of the sincere and humble Christian, and
that this same power in some mysterious way provides
for all.
A devout clergyman sought every opportunity to
impress upon the mind of his son the fact that God
takes care of all creatures ; that the falling sparrow
attracts his attention, and that his loving kindness is
over all his works. Happening, one day, to see a crane
wading in quest of food, the good man pointed out to

�22

Oration on the Gods.

his son the perfect adaptation of the crane to get his
living in that manner. “ See,’” said he, “ how his legs
are formed for wading ! What a long, slender bill he
has ! Observe how nicely he folds his feet when
putting them in or drawing them out of the water.
He does not cause the slightest ripple. He is thus
enabled to approach the fish without giving them any
notice of his arrival. My son,” said he, “ it is im­
possible to look at that bird without recognising the
design, as well the goodness of God, in thus providing
the means of subsistence.” “ Yes,” replied the boy,
“ I think I see the goodness of God, at least so far as
the crane is concerned ; but after all, father, don’t you
think the arrangement a little tough on the fish ?”
Even the advanced religionist, although disbelieving
in any great amount of interference by the gods in
this age of the world, still thinks that, in the beginning,
some god made the laws governing the universe. He
believes that in consequence of these laws a man can
lift a greater weight with, than without a lever ; that
this god so made matter, and so established the order
of things, that two bodies cannot occupy the same
space at the same time ; so that a body once put in
motion will keep moving until it is stopped ; so that
it is a greater distance around than across a cirle ; so
that a perfect square has four equal sides, instead of
five or seven. He insists that it took a direct inter­
position of providence to make a whole greater than a
part, and that had it not been for this power superior
to nature, twice one might have been more than twice
two, and sticks and strings might have had only one
end apiece. Like the old Scotch divine, he thanks
God that Sunday comes at the end instead of in the
middle of the week, and that death comes at the close
instead of at the commencement of life, thereby giving
us ¿ime to prepare for that holy day and that most
solemn event. These religious people see nothing but
design everywhere, and personal, intelligent interfer­
ence in everything. They insist that the universe has
been created, and that the adaptation of means to ends
is perfectly apparent. They point us to the sunshine,
to the flowers, to the April rain, and to all there is of

�Oration on the Gods.
beauty and of use in the world. Did it ever occur to
them that a cancer is as. beautiful in its development
as is the reddest rose ? That what they are pleased to
call the adaptation of means to ends, is as apparent in
the cancer as in the April rain ? How beautiful the
process of digestion ! By what ingenious methods the
blood is poisoned so that the cancer shall have food !
By what wonderful contrivances the entire system of
man is made to pay tribute to this divine and charming
cancer! See by what admirable instrumentalities it
feeds itself from the surrounding quivering, dainty
flesh ! See how it gradually, but surely, expands and
grows ! By what marvellous mechanism it is supplied
with long and slender roots that reach out to the most
secret nerves of pain for sustenance and life! What
beautiful colors it presents ! Seen through the micro­
scope, it is a miracle of order and beauty. All the
ingenuity of man cannot stop its growth. Think of the
amount of thought it must have required to invent a
way by which the life of one man might be given to
produce one cancer! Is it possible to look upon it and
doubt that there is design in the universe, and that the
inventor of this wonderful cancer must be infinitely
powerful, ingenious, and good ?
We are told that the universe was designed and
created, and that it is absurd to suppose that matter has
existed for eternity, but that it is perfectly self-evident
that a god has.
If a god created the universe, then there must have
been a time when he commenced to create. Back of
that time there must have been an eternity, during
which there had existed nothing—absolutely nothing
—except this supposed god. According to this theory,
this god spent an eternity, so to speak, in an infinite
vacuum, and in perfect idleness.
Admitting that a god did create the universe, the
question then arises, of -what did he create it ? It cer­
tainly was not made of nothing. Nothing, considered
in the light of a raw material, is a most decided failure.
It follows, then, that the god must have made the
universe out of himself, he being the only existence.
The universe is material, and if it was made of god,

�24

Oration on the Gods.

the god must have been material. With this very
thought in his mind, Anaximander, of Miletus, said :
“ Creation is the decomposition of the infinite.”
It has been demonstrated that the earth would fall to
the sun, only for the fact that it is attracted by other
worlds, and those worlds must be attracted by other
worlds still beyond them, and so on, without end. This
proves the material universe to be infinite. If an
infinite universe has been made out of an infinite god,
how much of the god is left ?
The idea of a creative deity is gradually being
abandoned, and nearly all truly scientific minds admit
that matter must have existed from eternity. It is in­
destructible, and the indestructible cannot be created.
It is the crowning glory of our century to have demon­
strated the indestructibility and the eternal persistence
of force. Neither matter nor force can be increased
nor diminished. Force cannot exist apart from matter ;
matter exists only in connection with force ; and con­
sequently a force apart from matter, and superior to
nature, is a demonstrated impossibility.
Force, then, must have also existed from eternity,
and could not have been created. Matter, in its count­
less forms, from dead earth to the eyes of those we love,
and force in all its manifestations, from simple motion
to the grandest thought, deny creation and defy control.
Thought is a form of force. We walk with the same
force with which we think. Man is an organism, that
changes several forms of force into thought-force. - Man
is a machine, into which we put what we call food, and
produce what we call thought. Think of that wonderful
chemistry by which bread was changed into the divine
tragedy of Hamlet!
A god must not only be material, but he must be an
organism, capable of changing other forms of force into
thought-force. This is what we call eating. Therefore,
if the god thinks, he must eat, that is to say, he must
of necessity have some means of supplying the force
with which to think. It is impossible to conceive of a
being who can eternally impart force to matter, and yet
have no means of supplying the force thus imparted.
If neither matter nor force were createcL what ev -

�Oration on the Gods.

25

dence have we then of the existence of a power superior
to nature ? The theologian will probably reply, “ We
have law and order, cause and effect, and besides all
this, matter could not have put itself in motion.”
Suppose, for the sake of the argument, that there is
no being superior to nature, and that matter and force
have existed from eternity. Now suppose that twoatoms should come together, would there be an effect ?
Yes. Suppose they came in exactly opposite directions
with equal force, they would be stopped, to say the
least. This would be an effect. If this is so, then you
have matter, force, and effect without a being superior
to nature. Now, suppose that two other atoms, just
like the first two, should come together under precisely
the same circumstances, would not the effect be exactly
the same ? Yes. Like causes producing like effects is
what we mean by law and order. Then we have matter,,
force, effect, law, and order without a being superior to
nature. Now, we know that every effect must also be
a cause, and that every cause must be an effect. The
atoms coming together did produce an effect, and as
every effect must also be a cause, the effect produced by
the collision of the atoms, must as to something else
have been a cause. Then we have matter, force, law,
order, cause, and effect, without a being superior to
nature. Nothing is left for the supernatural but empty
space. His throne is a void, and his boasted realm is
without matter, without law, without cause, and with­
out effect.
But what put all this matter in motion ? If matter
and force have existed from eternity, then matter must
have always been in motion. There can be no force
without motion. Force is for ever active, and there is,
and there can be, no cessation. If, therefore, matter
and force have existed from eternity, so has motion.
In the whole universe there is not even one atom in a
state of rest.
A deity outside of nature exists in nothing, and is
nothing. Nature embraces with infinite arms all matter
and all force. That which is beyond her grasp is
destitute of both, and can hardly be worth the worship,
and adoration even of a man.

�26

Oration on the Gods.

There is but one way to demonstrate the existence of
a power independent of and superior to nature, and
that is by breaking, if only for one moment, the con­
tinuity of cause and effect. Pluck from the endless
■chain of evidence one little link ; stop for one instant
the grand procession, and you have shown beyond all
contradiction that nature has a master. Change the
fact, just for one second, that matterattracts matter, and
a god appears.
The rudest savage has always known this fact, and
for that reason always demanded the evidence of
miracle. The founder of a religion must be able to
turn water into wine—cure with a word the blind and
lame, and raise with a simple touch the dead to life. It
was necessary for him to demonstrate to the satisfaction
of his barbarian disciple that he was superior to nature.
In times of ignorance, this was easy to do. The cre­
dulity of the savage was almost boundless. To him
the marvellous was the beautiful, the mysterious was
the sublime. Consequently every religion has for its
foundation a miracle—that is to say, a violation of
nature—that is to say, a falsehood.
No one, in the world’s whole history, ever attempted
to substantiate a truth by a miracle. Truth scorns the
assistance of miracle. Nothing but falsehood ever
attested itself by signs and wonders. No miracle was
ever performed, and no sane man ever thought he had
performed one, and until one is performed there can be
no evidence of the existence of any power superior to
and independent of nature.
The Church wishes us to believe. Let the Church, or
■one of its intellectual saints, perform a miracle, and we
will believe. We are told that nature has a superior.
Let this superior, for one single instant, control nature,
and we will admit the truth of your assertions.
We have heard talk enough. We have listened to all
the drowsy, idealess, vapid sermons that we wish to
hear. We have read your Bible, and the works of your
best minds. We have heard your prayers, your solemn
groans, and your reverential amens. All these amount
to less than nothing. We want one fact. We beg at
the doors of your churches for just one little fact. We

�Oration on the Gods.

27

pass our hats along your pews and under your pulpits,
and implore you for just one fact. We know all about
your mouldy wonders and your stale miracles. We
want a this year’s fact. We ask only one. Give us one
fact for charity. Your miracles are too ancient. The
witnesses have been dead for nearly two thousand
years. Their reputation for “truth and veracity”
in the neighborhood where they resided is wholly
unknown to us. Give us a new miracle, and sub­
stantiate it by witnesses who still have the cheerful
habit of living in this world. Do not send us to Jericho
to hear the winding horns, nor put us in the fire with
Meshech, Shadrach, and Abednego. Do not compel us
to navigate the sea with Captain Jonah, nor dine with
Mr. Ezekiel. There is no sort of use in sending us
fox-hunting with Samson. We have positively lost all
interest in that little speech so eloquently delivered by
Balaam’s inspired donkey. It is worse than useless to
show us fishes with money in their mouths, and call
our attention to vast multitudes stuffing themselves
with five crackers and two sardines. We demand a
new miracle, and we demand it now. Let the Church
furnish at least one, or for ever after hold her peace.
In the olden time the Church, by violating the order
of nature, proved the existence of her God. At that
time miracles were performed with the most astonish­
ing ease. They became so common that the Church
ordered her priests to desist. And now this same
Church—the people having found some little sense—
admits, not only that she cannot perform a miracle,
but insists that the absence of miracle—the steady, un­
broken march of cause and effect—proves the exist­
ence of a power superior to nature. The fact is,
however, that indissoluble change of cause and effect
proves exactly the contrary.
Sir William Hamilton, one of the pillars of modern
theology, in discussing this very subject, uses the
following language : “ The phenomena of matter, taken
by themselves, so far from warranting an inference to
the existence of a god, would, on the contrary, ground
even an argument to his negation. The phenomena
of the material world are subjected to immutable laws ;

�28

Oration on the Gods.

are produced and reproduced in the same invariable
succession, and manifest only the blind force of a
mechanical necessity.”
Nature is but an endless series of efficient causes.
She cannot create, but she eternally transforms. There
was no beginning, and there can be no end.
The best minds, even in the religious world, admit
that in material nature there is no evidence of what
they are pleased to call a god. They find their evidence
in the phenomena of intelligence, and very innocently
assert that intelligence is above, and, in fact, opposed
to nature. They insist that man, at least, is a special
creation; that he has somewhere in his brain a divine
spark, a little portion of the “ Great First Cause.” They
say that matter cannot produce thought, but that
thought can produce matter. They tell us that man
has intelligence, and, therefore, there must be an
intelligence greater than his ? Why not say, God has
intelligence, therefore there must be an intelligence
greater than his ? So far as we know there is no
intelligence apart from matter. We cannot conceive
of thought, except as produced within a brain.
The science by means of which they demonstrate
the existence of an impossible intelligence, and an
incomprehensible power, is called metaphysics, or
theology. The theologians admit that the phenomena
of matter tend, at least, to disprove the existence of
any power superior to nature, because in such pheno­
mena we see nothing but an endless chain of efficient
causes—nothing but the force of a mechanical necessity.
They therefore appeal to what they denominate the
phenomena of mind to establish this superior power.
The trouble is, that in the phenomena of mind we
find the same endless chain of efficient causes, the
same mechanical necessity. Every thought must have
had an efficient cause. Every motive, every desire,
every fear, hope, and dream must have been necessarily
produced. There is no room in the mind of man for
providence or chance. The facts and forces governing
thought are as absolute as those governing the motions
of the planets. A poem is produced by the forces of
nature, and is as necessarily and naturally produced as

�Oration on the Gods.

29

mountains and seas. You will seek in vain for a
thought in man’s brain without its efficient cause.
Every mental operation is the necessary result of
certain facts and conditions. Mental phenomena are
considered more complicated than those of matter, and,
consequently more mysterious. Being more mysterious,
they are considered better evidence of the existence of
a god. No one infers a god from the simple, from the
known, from what is understood, but from the com­
plex, from the unknown, and incomprehensible. Our
ignorance is God, what we know is science.
When we abandon the doctrine that some infinite
being created matter and force, and enacted a code of
laws for their government, the idea of interference
will be lost. The real priest will then be, not the
mouthpiece of some pretended deity, but the inter­
preter of nature. From that moment the church
ceases to exist. The tapers will die out upon the dusty
altar ; the moths will eat the fading velvet of pulpit
and pew; the Bible will take its place with the
Shastras, Puranas, Vedas, Eddas, Sagas, and Korans,
and the fetters of a degrading faith will fall from the
mind of men.
“ But,” says the religionist, “ you cannot explain
everything ; you cannot understand everything ; and
that which you cannot explain, that which you do not
comprehend, is my God.”
We are explaining more every day. We are under­
standing more every day; consequently your God is
growing smaller every day.
Nothing daunted, the religionist then insists, that
nothing can exist without a cause, except cause, and
■that this uncaused cause is God.
To this we again reply : Every cause must produce
an effect, because until it does produce an effect, it is
not a cause. Every effect must in its turn become a
cause. Therefore, in the nature of things, there cannot
be a last cause, for the reason that a so-called last cause
would necessarily produce an effect, and that effect
must of necessity become a cause. The converse of
these propositions must be true. Every effect must
have had a cause, and every cause must have been an

�30

Oration on the Gods.

effect. Therefore there could have been no first cause.
A first cause is just as impossible as a last effect.
Beyond the universe there is nothing, and within
the universe the supernatural does not and can not
exist.
The moment these great truths are understood and
admitted, a belief in general or special providence
becomes impossible. From that instant men will­
cease their vain efforts to please an imaginary being,
and will give their time and attention to the affairs of
this world. They will abandon the idea of attaining
any object by prayer and supplication. The element
of uncertainty will, in a great measure, be removed
from the domain of the future, and man, gathering
courage from a succession of victories over the
obstructions of nature, will attain a serene grandeur
unknown to the disciples of any superstition. The
plans of mankind will no longer be interfered with by
the finger of a supposed omnipotence, and no one will
believe that nations or individuals are protected or
destroyed by any deity whatever. Science, freed from
the chains of pious custom and evangelical prejudice,
will, within her sphere, be supreme. The mind will
investigate without reverence, and publish its con­
clusion without fear. Agassiz will no longer hesitate
to declare the Mosaic cosmogony utterly inconsistent
with the demonstrated truths of geology, and will
cease pretending any reverence for the Jewish
scriptures. The moment science succeeds in rendering
the Church powerless for evil, the real thinkers will be
outspoken. The little flags of truce carried by timid
philosophers will disappear, and the cowardly parley
will give place to victory—lasting and universal.
If we admit that some infinite being has controlled
the destinies of persons and peoples, history becomes a
most cruel and bloody farce. Age after age, the strong
have trampled upon the weak ; the crafty and heartless
have ensnared and enslaved the simple and innocent,
and nowhere, in all the annals of mankind, has any
god succored the oppressed.
Man should cease to expect aid from on high. By
this time he should know that heaven has no ear

�Oration on the Gods.

31

to hear, and no hand to help. The present is the
necessary child of all the past. There has been
no chance, and there can be no interference.
If abuses are destroyed, man must destroy them If
slaves are freed, man must free them. If new truths
are discovered, man must discover them. If the naked
are clothed ; if the hungry are fed ; if justice is done ;
if labor is rewarded ; if superstition is driven from the
mind ; if the defenceless are protected, and if the
right finally triumphs, all must be the work of man.
The grand victories of the future must be won by man,
and by man alone.
Nature, so far as we can discern, without passion and
without intention, forms, transforms, and re-transforms
for ever.
She neither weeps nor rejoices.
She
produces man without purpose, and obliterates him
without regret. She knows no distinction between the
beneficial and the hurtful. Poison and nutrition, pain
and joy, life and death, smiles and tears are alike to
her. She is neither merciful nor cruel. She cannot
be flattered by worship nor melted by tears. She does
not even know the attitude of prayer. She appreciates
no difference between poison in the fangs of snakes
and mercy in the hearts of men. Only through man
does nature take cognisance of the good, the true, and
the beautiful; and, so far as we know, man is the
highest intelligence.
And yet man continues to believe that there is some
power independent of and superior to nature, and still
endeavors, by form, ceremony, supplication, hypocrisy,
and sacrifice, to obtain its aid. His best energies have
been wasted in the service of this phantom. The
horrors of witchcraft were all born of an ignorant
belief in the existence of a totally depraved being
superior to nature, acting in perfect independence of
her laws, and all religious superstition has had for its
basis a belief in at least two beings, one good and the
other bad, both of whom could arbitrarily change the
order of the universe. The history of religion is
simply the story of man’s efforts in all ages to avoid
one of these powers and to pacify the other. Both
powers have inspired little else than abject fear. The

�32

Oration on the Gods.

cold, calculating sneer of the devil and the frown of
•God were equally terrible. In any event, man’s fate
was to be arbitrarily fixed for ever by an unknown
power superior to all law and to all fact. Until this
belief is thrown aside, man must consider himself the
■slave of phantom masters—neither of iwhom promise
liberty in this world nor the next.
Man must learn to rely upon himself. Reading
Bibles will not protect him from the blasts of winter;
but houses, fires, and clothing will.
To prevent
famine, one plough is worth a million sermons, and
«ven patent medicines will cure more diseases than all
the prayers uttered since the beginning of the world.
Although many eminent men have endeavored to
harmonise necessity and free will, the existence of
evil, and the infinite power and goodness of God, they
have only succeeded in producing learned and ingeni­
ous failures. Immense efforts have been made to
reconcile ideas utterly inconsistent with the facts by
which we are surrounded, and all persons who have
failed to perceive the pretended reconciliation have
been denounced as Infidels, Atheists, and scoffers.
The whole power of the Church has been brought to
bear against philosophers and scientists in order to
•compel a denial of the authority of demonstration, and
to induce some Judas to betray Reason—one of the
saviors of mankind.
During that frightful period known as the “ Dark
Ages,” Faith reigned, with scarcely a rebellious subject.
Her temples were “ carpeted with knees,” and the
wealth of nations adorned her countless shrines. The
■great painters prostituted their genius to immortalise
her vagaries, while the poets enshrined them in song
At her bidding, man covered the earth with blood.
The scales of justice were turned with her gold, and
for her use were invented all the cunning instruments
of pain. She built cathedrals for God, and dungeons
for men. She peopled the clouds with angels and the
■earth with slaves. For centuries the world was
retracing its steps—going steadily back towards barbaric
night. A few infidels—a few heretics cried “ Halt!”
to the great rabble of ignorant devotion, and made it

�Oration on the Gods.

33

possible for the genius of the nineteenth century to
revolutionise the cruel creeds and superstitions of
mankind.
The thoughts of man, in order to be of any real
worth, must be free. Under the influence of fear, the
brain is paralysed, and instead of bravely solving a
problem for itself, trembling adopts the solution of
another. As long as a majority of men will cringe to
the very earth before some petty prince or king, what
must be the infinite abjectness of their little souls in
the presence of their supposed creator and God ? Under
such circumstances, what can their thoughts be worth ?
The originality of repetition, and the mental vigor
of acquiescence, are all that we have any right to
expect from the Christian world. As long as every
question is answered by the word “god,” scientific
inquiry is simply impossible. As fast as phenomena
are satisfactorily explained, the domain of the power,
supposed to be superior to nature, must decrease, while
the horizon of the known must as constantly continue
to enlarge.
It is no longer satisfactory to account for the fall
and rise of nations by saying: “ It is the will of God.”
Such an explanation puts ignorance and education
upon an exact equality, and does away with the idea
of really accounting for anything whatever.
Will the religionist pretend that the real end of
science is, to ascertain how and why God acts ?
Science, from such a standpoint, would consist in
investigating the law of arbitrary action, and in a
grand endeavor to ascertain the rules necessarily
obeyed by infinite caprice.
From a philosophic point of view, science is a
knowledge of the laws of life ; of the conditions of
happiness ; of the facts by which we are surrounded,
and the relations we sustain to men and things—by
which man, so to speak, subjugates nature, and bends
the elemental powers to his will, making blind force
the servant of his brain.
A belief in special providence does away with the
spirit of investigation, and is inconsistent with personal
effort. Why should man endeavor to thwart the
c

�34

Oration on the G-ools.

designs of God ? “ Which of you, by taking thought,
can add one cubit to his stature ?” Under the influence
of this belief, man, basking in the sunshine of a
delusion, considers the lilies of the field and refuses to
take any thought for the morrow. Believing himself
in the power of an infinite being, who can, at any
moment, dash him to the lowest hell or raise him to
the highest heaven, he necessarily abandons the idea
of accomplishing anything by his own efforts. As
long as this belief was general, the world was filled
with ignorance, superstition and misery. The energies
of man were wasted in a vain effort to obtain the aid
of this power, supposed to be superior to nature. For
countless ages, even men were sacrificed upon the
altar of this impossible god. To please him, mothers
have shed the blood of their own babes ; martyrs have
chanted triumphant songs in the midst of flame;
priests have gorged themselves with blood ; nuns have
foresworn the ecstasies of love : old men have trem­
blingly implored ; women have sobbed and entreated ;
every pain has been endured, and every horror has
been perpetrated.
Through the dim, long years that have fled, humanity
has suffered more than can be conceived. Most of
the misery has been endured by the weak, the loving,
and the innocent. Women have been treated like
poisonous beasts, and little children trampled upon as
though they had been vermin. Numberless altars
have been reddened, even with the blood of babes ;
beautiful girls have been given to slimy serpents;
whole races of men doomed to centuries of slavery,
and everywhere there has been outrage beyond the
power of genius to express. During all these years,
the suffering have supplicated ; the withered lips of
famine have prayed ; the pale victims have implored,
and Heaven has been deaf and blind.
Of what use have the gods been to man ?
It is no answer to say that some god created the
world, established certain laws, and then turned his
attention to other matters, leaving his children weak,
ignorant, and unaided, to fight the battle of life alone.
It is no solution to declare that in some other world

�Oration on the Gods.

35

this god will render a few, or even all, his subjects
happy. What right have we to expect that a perfectly
wise, good, and powerful being will ever do better
than he has done, and is doing ? The world is filled
with imperfections. If it was made by an infinite
being what reason have we for saying that he will
render it nearer perfect than it now is ? If the
infinite “ Father ” allows a majority of his children to
live in ignorance and wretchedness now, what evidence
is there that he will ever improve their condition ?
Will God have more power ? Will he become more
merciful ? Will his love for his poor creatures
increase ? Can the conduct of infinite wisdom, power,
and love ever change ? Is the infinite capable of any
improvement whatever ?
We are informed by the clergy that this world is a
kind of school; that the evils by which we are
surrounded are for the purpose of developing our
souls, and that only by suffering can men become
pure, strong, virtuous, and grand.
Supposing this to be true, what is to become of
those who die in infancy ? The little children,
according to this philosophy, can never be developed.
They were so unfortunate as to escape the ennobling
influences of pain and misery, and as a consequence,
are doomed to an eternity of mental inferiority. If
the clergy are right on this question, none are so
unfortunate as the happy, and we should envy only
the suffering and distressed. If evil is necessary
to the development of man in this life, how is it
possible for the soul to improve in the perfect joy of
paradise ?
Since Paley found his watch, the argument of
“ design ’’ has been relied upon as unanswerable. The
Church teaches that this world, and all it contains,
was created substantially as we now see it; that the
grasses, the flowers, the trees, and all animals,
including man, were special creations, and that they
sustain no necessary relation to each other. The most
orthodox will admit that some earth has been washed
into the sea, that the sea has encroached a little
upon the land, and that some mountains may be

�36

Oration on the Gods.

a trifle lower than in the morning of creation. The
theory of gradual development was unknown to our
fathers ; the idea of evolution did not occur to them.
That most wonderful observer, Charles Darwin, had
not then given to the world his wonderful philosophy.
Our fathers looked upon the then arrangement of
things as the primal arrangement. The earth appeared
to them fresh from the hands of a deity. They knew
nothing of the slow evolutions of countless years, but
supposed that the almost infinite variety of vegetable
and animal forms had existed from the first.
Suppose that upon some island we should find a man
a million years of age, and suppose that we should
find him in the possession of a most beautiful carriage,
constructed upon the perfect model. And suppose
further that he should tell us that it was the result of
several hundred thousand years of labor and of
thought ; that for fifty thousand years he used as flat a
log as he could find, before it occurred to him that, by
splitting the log, he could have thè same surface with
only half the weight ; that it took him many thousand
years to invent wheels for this log ; that the wheels
he first used were solid, and that fifty thousand years
of thought suggested the use of spokes and tire ; that
for many centuries he used the wheels without linch­
pins ; that it took a hundred thousand years more to
think of using four wheels instead of two ; that
for ages he walked behind the carriage when going
down hill, in order to hold it back, and that only by a
lucky chance he invented the tongue—would we
conclude that this man, from the very first, had been
an infinitely ingenious and perfect mechanic ?
Suppose we found him living in an elegant mansion,
and he should inform us that he lived in that house
for five hundred thousand years before he thought of
putting on a roof, and that he had but recently
invented windows and doors, would we say that from
the beginning he had been an infinitely accomplished
and scientific architect ?
Does not improvement in the things created show a
corresponding improvement in the creator ?
Would an infinitely wise, good, and powerful God,

�Oration on the Gods.

37

intending to produce man, commence with the lowest
possible forms of life—with the simplest organism
that can be imagined—and, during immeasurable
periods of time, slowly and almost imperceptibly,
improve upon the rude beginning until man was
evolved ? Would countless ages thus be wasted in the
production of awkward forms, afterwards abandoned ?
Can the intelligence of man discover the least wisdom
in covering the earth with crawling, creeping horrors,
that live only upon the agonies and pangs of others ?
Can we see the propriety of so constructing the earth
that only an insignificant portion of its surface is
capable of producing an intelligent man ? Who can
appreciate the mercy of so making the world that all
animals devour animals, so that every mouth is a
slaughter-house and every stomach a tomb? Is it
possible to discover infinite intelligence and love in
universal and eternal carnage ?
What would we think of a father who should give a
farm to his children, and before giving them possession
should plant upon it thousands of deadly shrubs and
vines; should stock it 'with ferocious beasts and
poisonous reptiles; should take pains to put a few
swamps in the neighborhood to breed malaria ; should
so arrange matters that the ground would occasionally
open and swallow a few of his darlings, and, besides
all this, should establish a few volcanoes in the imme­
diate vicinity, that might at any moment overwhelm
his children with rivers of fire ? Suppose that this
father neglected to tell his children which of the
plants were deadly ; that the reptiles were poisonous ;
failed to say anything about the earthquakes, and kept
the volcano business a profound secret, would we
pronounce him angel or fiend ?
And yet this is exactly what the orthodox God has
done.
According to the theologians, God prepared this
globe expressly for the habitation of his loved children,
and yet he filled the forests with ferocious beasts,
placed serpents in every path, stuffed the world with
earthquakes, and adorned its surface with mountains
of flame.

�38'

Oration on the Gods.

Notwithstanding all this, we are told that the world
is perfect ; that it was created by a perfect being, and
is therefore necessarily perfect. The next moment
the same persons will tell us that the world was cursed,
covered with brambles, thistles, and thorns, and that
man was doomed to disease and death, simply because
our poor dear mother ate an apple contrary to the com­
mand of an arbitrary God.
A very pious friend of mine, having heard that I
had said the world was full of imperfections, asked me
if the report was true. Upon being informed that it was,
he expressed great surprise that anyone could be guilty
of such presumption. He said that, in his judgment, it
was impossible to point out an imperfection. “ Be
kind enough,” said he, “ to name even one improvement
that you could make, if you had the power.” “ Well,”
said I, “ I would make good health catching, instead of
disease.” The truth is, it is impossible to harmonise
all the ills, and pains, and agonies of this world with
the idea that we were created by, and are watched
over and protected by, an infinitely wise, powerful,
and beneficent God, who is superior to, and inde­
pendent of, nature.
The clergy, however, balance all the real ills of this
life with the expected joys of the next. We are
assured that all is perfection in heaven ; there the
skies are cloudless, there all is serenity and peace.
Here empires may be overthrown ; dynasties may be
extinguished in blood ; millions of slaves may toil
beneath the fierce rays of the sun and the cruel strokes
of the lash ; yet all is happiness in heaven. Pestilence
may strew the earth with corpses of the loved ; the
survivors may bend above them in agony—yet the
placid bosom of heaven is unruffled. Children may
expire vainly asking for bread ; babes may be devoured
by serpents, while the gods sit smiling in the clouds ;
the innocent may languish unto death in the obscurity
of dungeons; brave men and heroic women may be
changed to ashes at the bigot’s stake, while heaven is
filled with song and joy. Out on the wide sea, in
darkness and in storm, the shipwrecked struggle with
the cruel waves, while the angels play upon their

�Oration on the Gods.

39

golden harps. The streets of the world are filled with
the diseased, the deformed, and the helpless; the
chambers of pain are crowded with the pale forms of
the suffering, while the angels float and fly in the
happy realms of day. In heaven they are too happy
to have sympathy ; too busy singing to aid the implor­
ing and distressed. Their eyes are blinded, their ears
are stopped, and their hearts are turned to stone by the
infinite selfishness of joy. The saved mariner is too
happy when he touches the shore to give a moment’s
thought to his drowning brothers. With the indiffer­
ence of happiness, with the contempt of bliss, heaven
barely glances at the miseries of earth. Cities are
devoured by the rushing lava; the earth opens and
thousands perish; women raise their clasped hands
towards heaven, but the gods are too happy to aid their
children. The smiles of the deities are unacquainted
with the tears of men. The shouts of heaven drown
the sobs of earth.
In all ages man has prayed for help, and then helped
himself.
Having shown how man created gods, and how he
became the trembling slave of his own creation, the
question naturally arises: How did he free himself,
even a little, from these monarchs of the sky ; from
these despots of the clouds ; from this aristocracy of
the air ? How did he, even to the extent that he has,
outgrow his ignorant, abject terror, and throw off the
yoke of superstition ?
Probably, the first thing that tended to disabuse his
mind was the discovery of order, of regularity, of
periodicity in the universe. From this, he began to
suspect that everything did not happen purely with
reference to him. He noticed that, whatever he might
do, the motions of the planets were always the same ;
that eclipses were periodical, and that even comets
came at certain intervals. This convinced him that
eclipses and comets had nothing to do with him. He
perceived that they were not caused for his benefit nor
injury. He thus learned to regard them with admira­
tion instead of fear. He began to suspect that famine
was not sent by some enraged and revengeful deity, but

�40

Oration on the Gods.

resulted often from the neglect and ignorance of man.
He learned that diseases were not produced by evil
spirits. He found that sickness was occasioned by
natural causes, and could be cured by natural means.
He demonstrated, to his own satisfaction at least, that
prayer is not a medicine. He found by sad experience
that his gods were of no practical use, as they never
assisted him, except when he was perfectly able to help
himself. At last he began to discover that his indi­
vidual action had nothing whatever to do with strange
appearances in the heavens; that it was impossible for
him to be bad enough to cause a whirlwind, or good
enough to stop one. After many centuries of thought,
he about half concluded that making mouths at a priest
would not necessarily cause an earthquake. He noticed,
and no doubt with considerable astonishment, that very
good men were occasionally struck by lightning,
while very bad ones escaped. He was frequently
forced to the painful conclusion (and it is the most
painful to which any human being ever was forced)
that the right did not always prevail. He noticed that
the gods did not interfere in behalf of the weak and
innocent. He was now and then astonished by seeing
an unbeliever in the enjoyment of most excellent
health. He finally ascertained that there could be no
possible connection between an unusually severe winter
and his failure to give a sheep to a priest. He began
to suspect that the order of the universe was not con­
stantly being changed to assist him because he repeated
a creed. He observed that some children would steal
after having been regularly baptised. He noticed a
vast difference between religion and justice, and that
the worshippers of the same god took delight in cutting
each others’ throats. He saw that these religious
disputes filled the world with hatred and slavery. At
last he had the courage to suspect that no god at any
time interferes with the order of events. He learned
a few facts, and these facts positively refused to har­
monise with the ignorant superstitions of his fathers.
Finding his sacred books incorrect and false in some
particulars, his faith in their authenticity began to be
shaken ; finding his priests ignorant upon some points,

�Oration on the Oods.

41

he began to lose respect for the cloth; this was the
commencement of intellectual freedom.
The civilisation of man has increased just to the
same extent that religious power has decreased. The
intellectual advancement of man depends upon how
often he can exchange an old superstition for a new
truth. The Church never enabled a human being to
make even one of these exchanges ; on the contrary,
all her power has been used to prevent them. In spite,
however, of the Church, man found that some of his
religious conceptions were wrong. By reading his
Bible, he found that the ideas of his god were more
cruel and brutal than those of the most depraved
savage. He also discovered that this holy book was
filled with ignorance, and that it must have been
written by persons wholly unacquainted with the
nature of the phenomena by which we are sur­
rounded, and now and then some man had the
goodness and courage to speak his honest thoughts.
In every age some thinker, some doubter, some
investigator, some hater of hypocrisy, some despiser of
sham, some brave lover of the right, has gladly,
proudly, and heroically braved the ignorant fury of
superstition for the sake of man and truth. These
divine men were generally torn in pieces by the
worshippers of the gods. Socrates was poisoned
because he lacked reverence for some of the deities.
Christ was crucified by a religious rabble for the crime
of blasphemy. Nothing is more gratifying to a reli­
gionist than to destroy his enemies at the command
of God. Religious persecution springs from a due
admixture of love towards God and hatred towards
man.
The terrible religious wars that inundated the world
with blood tended, at least, to bring all religion into
disgrace and hatred. Thoughtful people began to
question the divine origin of a religion that made its
believers hold the rights of others in absolute con­
tempt. A few began to compare Christianity with the
religions of heathen people, and were forced to admit
that the difference was hardly worth dying for. They
also found that other nations were even happier and

�42

Oration on the Gods.

more prosperous than their own. They began to
suspect that their religion, after all, was not of much
real value.
For three hundred years the Christian world endea­
vored to rescue from the “ Infidel ” the empty sepulchre
of Christ. For three hundred years the armies of the
Cross were baffled and beaten by the victorious hosts
of an impudent impostor. This immense fact sowed
the seeds of distrust throughout all Christendom, and
millions began to lose confidence in a God who had
been vanquished by Mohammed. The people also
found that commerce made friends where religion
made enemies, and that religious zeal was utterly
incompatible with peace between nations’ or indi­
viduals. They discovered that those who loved the
gods most were apt to love men least; that the arro­
gance of universal forgiveness was amazing ; that the
most malicious had the effrontery to pray for their
enemies ; and that humility and tyranny were the
fruit of the same tree.
For ages a deadly conflict has been waged between a
few brave men and women of thought and genius on
the one side, and the great ignorant religious mass on
the other. This is the war between Science and Faith.
The few have appealed to reason, to honor, to law, to
freedom, to the known, and to happiness here in this
world. The many have appealed to prejudice, to fear,
to miracle, to slavery, to the unknown, and to misery
hereafter. The few have said, “ Think !” The many
have said “ Believe ?”
The first doubt was the womb and the cradle of
progress, and from the first doubt man has continued
to advance. Men began to investigate and the Church
began to oppose. The astronomer scanned the heavens,
while the Church branded his grand forehead with the
word “ infidel,” and now not a glittering star in all the
vast expanse bears a Christian name. In spite of all
religion the geologist penetrated the earth, read her
history in books of stone, and found hidden within her
bosom souvenirs of all ages. Old ideas perished in the
retort of the chemist, and useful truths took their
places. One by one religious conceptions have been

�Oration on the Gods.

43-

placed in the crucibles of science, and thus far nothing
but dross has been found. A new world has been
discovered by the microscope ; everywhere has been
found the infinite ; in every direction man has investi­
gated and explored, and nowhere, in earth nor stars,
has been found the footstep of any being superior to
or independent of nature. Nowhere has been dis­
covered the slightest evidence of any interference from
without.
These are the sublime truths that enabled man to
throw off the yoke of superstition. These are the
splendid facts that snatched the sceptre of authority
from the hands of priests.
In that vast cemetery called the past are most of the
religions of men, and there, too, are nearly all their
gods. The sacred temples of India were ruins long
ago. Over column and cornice, over the painted and
pictured walls, cling and creep the trailing vines.
Brahma, the golden, with four heads and four arms ;
Vishnu, the sombre, the punisher of the wicked, with
his three eyes, his crescent, and his necklace of skulls ;
Siva, the destroyer, red with seas of blood ; Kali, the
goddess ; Draupadi, the white-armed ; and Chrishna,
the Christ—all passed away and left the thrones of
heaven desolate. Along the banks of the sacred Nile,
Isis no longer wandering weeps, searching for the dead
Osiris. The shadow of Typhon’s scowl falls no more
upon the waves. The sun rises as of yore, and his
golden beams still smite the lips of Memnon, but
Memnon is as voiceless as the Sphinx. The sacred
fanes are lost in desert sands ; the dusty mummies
are still waiting for the resurrection promised by
their priests, and the old beliefs, wrought in
curiously sculptured stone, sleep in the mystery
of a language lost and dead. Odin, the author of
life and soul, Vili and Ve, and the mighty giant
Yamir, strode long ago from the icy halls of the
North ; and Thor, with iron glove and glittering
hammer, dashes mountains to the earth no more.
Broken are the circles and cromlechs of the ancient
Druids ; fallen upon the summits of the hills and
covered with the centuries’ moss are the sacred cairns.

�44

Oration on the Gods.

The divine fires of Persia and of the Aztecs have died
out in the ashes of the past, and there is none to re­
kindle and none to feed the holy flames. The harp of
Orpheus is still ; the drained cup of Bacchus has been
thrown aside ; Venus lies dead in stone, and her white
bosom heaves no more with love. The streams still
murmur, but no Naiads bathe ; the trees still wave,
but in the forest aisles no Dryads dance. The gods
have flown from high Olympus. Not even the beautiful
women can lure them back, and even Danae lies un­
noticed, naked to the stars. Hushed for ever are the
thunders of Sinai; lost are the voices of the prophets,
and the land, once flowing with milk and honey, is but
a desert waste. One by one the myths had faded from
the clouds ; one by one the phantom hosts have dis­
appeared ; and one by one facts, truths, and realities
have taken their places. The supernatural has almost
gone, but the natural remains. The gods have fled, but
man is here.
“Nations, like individuals, have their periods of
youth, of manhood, and decay.” Religions are the
same. The same inexorable destiny awaits them all.
The gods, created by the nations, must perish with
their creators. They were created by men, and like
men they must pass away. The deities of one age are
the bye-words of the next. The religion of our day
and country is no more exempt from the sneer of the
future than the others have been. When India was
supreme, Brahma sat upon the world’s throne. When
the sceptre passed to Egypt, Isis and Osiris received the
homage of mankind. Greece, with her fierce valor,
swept to empire, and Jove put on the purple of
authority. The earth trembled with the tread of
Rome’s intrepid sons, and Jupiter grasped with mailed
hand the thunderbolts of heaven. Rome fell, and
Christians from her territory, with the red sword of
war, carved out the ruling nations of the world, and
now Christ sits upon the old throne. Who will be his
successor ?
Day by day religious conceptions grow less and less
intense. Day by day the old spirit dies out of book
and creed. The burning enthusiasm, the quenchless zeal

�Oration on the Gods.

45

of the early Church have gone, never, never tc return.
The ceremonials remain, but the ancient faith is fading
out of the human heart. The worn-out arguments fail
to convince, and denunciations that once blanched the
faces of a race excite in us only derision and disgust.
As time rolls on, the miracles grow mean and small,
and the evidences our fathers thought conclusive
utterly fail to satisfy us. There is an “ irrepressible
conflict ” between religion and science, and they cannot
peaceably occupy the same brain nor the same world.
While utterly discarding all creeds, and denying the
truth of all religions, there is neither in my heart nor
upon my lips a sneer for the hopeful, loving, and tender
souls who believe that from all this discord will result
a perfect harmony ; that every evil will in some
mysterious way become a good, and that above and
over all there is a being who in some way will reclaim
and glorify every one of the children of men. But for
the creeds of those who glibly prove that salvation is
almost impossible ; that damnation is almost certain ;
that the highway of the universe leads to hell; who fill
life with fear, and death with horror ; who curse the
cradle and mock the tomb ;—it is impossible to entertain
other than feelings of pity, contempt, and scorn.
Reason, Observation, and Experience—the Holy
Trinity of Science—have taught us that happiness is
the only good : that the time to be happy is now, and
the way to be happy is to make others so. This is
enough for us. In this belief we are content to live
and die. If, by any possibility, the existence of a
power superior to and independent of nature shall be
demonstrated, there will then be time enough to kneel.
Until then let us stand erect.
Notwithstanding the fact that Infidels in all ages
have battled for the rights of man, and have at all
times been the fearless advocates of liberty and justice,
we are constantly charged by the Church with tearing
down without building again. The Church should
by this time know that it is utterly impossible to rob
men of their opinions. The history of religious per­
secution fully establishes the fact that the mind neces­
sarily resists and defies every attempt to control it by

�46

Oration on the Gods.

violence. The mind necessarily clings to old ideas
until prepared for the new. The moment we com­
prehend the truth, all erroneous ideas are of necessity
east aside.
A surgeon once called upon a poor cripple and
kindly offered to render him any assistance in his
power. The surgeon began to discourse very learnedly
upon the nature and origin of disease ; of the curative
properties of certain medicines; of the advantages of
exercise, air, and light, and of the various ways in
which health and strength could be restored. These
remarks were so full of good sense, and discovered so
much profound thought and accurate knowledge, that
the cripple, becoming thoroughly alarmed, cried out,
“ Do not, I pray you, take away my crutches. They
are my only support, and without them I should be
miserable indeed !” “ I am not going,” said the sur­
geon, “ to take away your crutches ; I am going to
cure you, and then you will throw the crutches awav
yourself.”
For the vagaries of the clouds the infidels propose
to substitute the realities of earth ; for superstition, the
splendid demonstrations and achievements of Science;
and for theological tyranny, the chainless liberty of
Thought.
We do not say that we have discovered all ; that our
doctrines are the all-in-all of truth. We know of no
end to the development of man. We cannot unravel
the infinite complications of matter and of force.
The history of one monad is as unknown as the uni­
verse ; one drop of water is as wonderful as all the
seas ; one leaf as all the forests ; and one grain of sand
as all the stars.
We are not endeavoring to chain the future, but to
free the present. We are not forging fetters for our
children, but we are breaking those our fathers made
for us. We are the advocates of inquiry, of investiga­
tion, and thought. This of itself is an admission that
we are not perfectly satisfied with all our conclusions.
Philosophy has not the egotism of faith. While super­
stition builds Walls and creates obstructions, science
opens all the highways of thought. We do not pretend

�Oration on the Gods-

47

to have circumnavigated everything, and to have
solved all difficulties, but we do believe that it is
better to love men than to fear gods ; that it is grander
and nobler to think and investigate for yourself than
to repeat a creed or quote scripture like a religious
parrot, with the countenance of a dyspeptic owl. We
are satisfied that there can be but little liberty on earth
while men worship a tyrant in heaven. We do not
expect to accomplish everything in our day ; but we
want to do what good we can, and to render all the
service possible in the holy cause of human progress.
We know that doing away with gods and supernatural
persons and powers is not an end. It is a means to an
end, the real end being the happiness of man.
Felling forests is not the end of agriculture. Driving
pirates from the sea is not all there is of commerce.
We are laying the foundations of the grand temple
of the future—not the temple of all the gods, but of all
the people—wherein, with appropriate rites, will be
celebrated the religion of Humanity. We are doing
what little we can to hasten the coming of the day
when society shall cease producing millionaires and
mendicants—gorged indolence and famished industry
—truth in rags and superstition robed and crowned.
We are looking for the time when the useful shall be
the honorable, when the true shall be the beautiful,
and when Reason, throned upo$ the world’s brain,
shall be the King of kings and God of gods.

���WORKS BY COL. R. G. INGERSOLL.
g

(J

MISTAKES OF MOSES
...
...
...10
Superior edition, in cloth
1 f;
DEFENCE OF FREETHOUGHT
77.
77 o 6
Five Hours’ Speech at the Trial of C. B.
Reynolds for Blasphemy.
REPLY TO GLADSTONE. With a Biography by
J. M. Wheel er ...
...
...
..04
ROME OR REASON ? Reply to Cardinal Manning 0 4
CRIMES AGAINST CRIMINALS
...
... 0 3
AN ORATION ON WALT WHITMAN...
o 3
ORATION ON VOLTAIRE ...
. .
o 3
ABRAHAM LINCOLN
...
o 3
PAINE THE PIONEER
...
7i
0 2
HUMANITY’S DEBT TO THOMAS PAINE
7. 0 2
ERNEST RENAN AND JESUS CHRIST
0 2
THE THREE PHILANTHROPISTS
...
0 2
TRUE RELIGION ...
...
...
’7 o 2
FAITH AND FACT. Reply to Rev. Dr. Field
... 0 2
GOD AND MAN. Second Reply to Dr. Field
... 0 2
SKULLS ...
.
02
THE HOUSEHOLD OF FAITH
7.
*” 0 2
LOVE THE REDEEMER. Reply to Count Tolstoi 0 2
THE LIMITS OF TOLERATION
...
... 0 2
A Discussion with Hon. F. D. Ooudert and
Gov. S. L. Woodford
THE DYING CREED
o 2
DO I BLASPHEME ?
...
*7 0 2
THE CLERGY AND COMMON SENSE*’
7. 0 2
SOCIAL SALVATION
...
...
o 2
MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE ...
...
*02
GOD AND THE STATE
...
...
.7. 0 2
WHY AM I AN AGNOSTIC?
... o 2
WHY AM I AN AGNOSTIC ? Part II*”
.
o 2
ART AND MORALITY
...
...
o 2
CREEDS AND SPIRITUALITY
0 1
CHRIST AND MIRACLES
0 1
THE GREA.T MISTAKE
...
” 0 1
LIVE TOPICS
...
”*0 1
REAL BLASPHEMY
77
”*
*01
REPAIRING THE IDOLS
...
’
* 0 1
MYTH AND MIRACLE
’*’
” 0 1
Printed by G, W. Foote, 14 Clerkenweil-green, London.

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="6">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="2374">
                <text>Victorian Blogging</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16307">
                <text>A collection of digitised nineteenth-century pamphlets from Conway Hall Library &amp;amp; Archives. This includes the Conway Tracts, Moncure Conway's personal pamphlet library; the Morris Tracts, donated to the library by Miss Morris in 1904; the National Secular Society's pamphlet library and others. The Conway Tracts were bound with additional ephemera, such as lecture programmes and handwritten notes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please note that these digitised pamphlets have been edited to maximise the accuracy of the OCR, ensuring they are text searchable. If you would like to view un-edited, full-colour versions of any of our pamphlets, please email librarian@conwayhall.org.uk.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.heritagefund.org.uk/sites/default/files/media/attachments/TNLHLF_Colour_Logo_English_RGB_0_0.jpg" width="238" height="91" alt="TNLHLF_Colour_Logo_English_RGB_0_0.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16308">
                <text>Conway Hall Library &amp; Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16309">
                <text>2018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="16310">
                <text>Conway Hall Ethical Society</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    <elementContainer>
      <element elementId="7">
        <name>Original Format</name>
        <description>The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data</description>
        <elementTextContainer>
          <elementText elementTextId="3957">
            <text>Pamphlet</text>
          </elementText>
        </elementTextContainer>
      </element>
    </elementContainer>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3955">
              <text>Oration on the gods</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="39">
          <name>Creator</name>
          <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3956">
              <text>Ingersoll, Robert Green [1833-1899]</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="41">
          <name>Description</name>
          <description>An account of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3958">
              <text>Place of publication: London&#13;
Collation: 47 p. ; 18 cm.&#13;
Notes: Part of the NSS pamphlet collection. Cover title: "The gods: an oration". "Works by Col. R.G. Ingersoll" listed on back cover. No. 28j in Stein checklist. Printed by G.W. Foote.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="45">
          <name>Publisher</name>
          <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3959">
              <text>R. Forder</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3960">
              <text>1893</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="43">
          <name>Identifier</name>
          <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3961">
              <text>N354</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="26235">
              <text>God</text>
            </elementText>
            <elementText elementTextId="26236">
              <text>Agnosticism</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="26237">
              <text>&lt;img src="http://i.creativecommons.org/p/mark/1.0/88x31.png" alt="Public Domain Mark" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span&gt;This work (Oration on the gods), identified by &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href="https://conwayhallcollections.omeka.net/items/show/www.conwayhall.org.uk"&gt;Humanist Library and Archives&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;, is free of known copyright restrictions.&lt;/span&gt;</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="42">
          <name>Format</name>
          <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="26238">
              <text>application/pdf</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="26239">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="44">
          <name>Language</name>
          <description>A language of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="26240">
              <text>English</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
  <tagContainer>
    <tag tagId="287">
      <name>Agnosticism</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="377">
      <name>Gods</name>
    </tag>
    <tag tagId="1613">
      <name>NSS</name>
    </tag>
  </tagContainer>
</item>
